2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromitite petrogenesis in the mantle section of the Ballantrae Ophiolite Complex (Scotland)

Abstract: Podiform chromitites from the Ballantrae Ophiolite Complex (BOC), NW Scotland, are examined to investigate their petrogenesis and elucidate the nature of melt percolation in the supra-subduction zone oceanic mantle more generally. The mantle portion of the BOC comprises two petrologically distinct serpentinite belts, whose differences have previously been attributed to different degrees of upper mantle melt extraction. Chromitite occurs in each of the northern and southern serpentinite belts, at Pinbain Bridge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A role of COHS-bearing fluids, which are expected in sub-cratonic mantle environments related to kimberlite genesis, could therefore also be a controlling factor for the observed variability of Zn in both Xen and Chr spinels of this study. It is worth noting that Zn 2+ and Co 2+ in the tetrahedral coordination have a very similar ionic radius and consequently T-O distances (1.98 and 1.96 Å [39]; 1.96 Å for both [40]; 1.960 and 1.972 Å, [41]), which may explain the systematic correlations between these two elements in Cr-spinel from different host lithologies (this work, see Supplementary Figure S1; ophiolitic chromite [42][43][44]; magmatic and metamorphic chromite [44] Cr-spinel in mantle xenoliths [18]).…”
Section: Zincmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A role of COHS-bearing fluids, which are expected in sub-cratonic mantle environments related to kimberlite genesis, could therefore also be a controlling factor for the observed variability of Zn in both Xen and Chr spinels of this study. It is worth noting that Zn 2+ and Co 2+ in the tetrahedral coordination have a very similar ionic radius and consequently T-O distances (1.98 and 1.96 Å [39]; 1.96 Å for both [40]; 1.960 and 1.972 Å, [41]), which may explain the systematic correlations between these two elements in Cr-spinel from different host lithologies (this work, see Supplementary Figure S1; ophiolitic chromite [42][43][44]; magmatic and metamorphic chromite [44] Cr-spinel in mantle xenoliths [18]).…”
Section: Zincmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This value is particularly interesting because, in meteoritic spinels, the Fe 3+ is virtually absent, so that it allows the possibility to discriminate between terrestrial and extraterrestrial occurrences. [41]; red dotted lines: Cr-spinels from Shetland ophiolites [42]; red dot and dash lines: ferrian-chromite rims of Cr-spinels from Shetland ophiolites [42]; blue dotted lines: Cr-spinels from Leka ophiolites [43]; blue dot and dash lines: ferrian-chromite rims of Crspinels from Leka ophiolites [43]. Fields for Arc, OIB (ocean island basalts), BABB (back arc basin Basalts), and MORB (mid ocean ridge basalts) after [12,19].…”
Section: Cr-spinelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, they differ from the closest Alaskan complexes of the Urals, that, by the way, are also younger, showing a comparable Cr# in the range 0.60-0.85, but lower Fe# in the range 0.2-0.8 [44,45]. When inserted into the ternary Cr-Fe 3+ -Al diagram, they perfectly fall into the field of alkali basalts, lamprophyres, [41]; red dotted lines: Cr-spinels from Shetland ophiolites [42]; red dot and dash lines: ferrian-chromite rims of Cr-spinels from Shetland ophiolites [42]; blue dotted lines: Cr-spinels from Leka ophiolites [43]; blue dot and dash lines: ferrian-chromite rims of Cr-spinels from Leka ophiolites [43]. Fields for Arc, OIB (ocean island basalts), BABB (back arc basin Basalts), and MORB (mid ocean ridge basalts) after [12,19].…”
Section: Cr-spinelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taitao, Chile (Schulte et al 2009), parts of the Italian Ligurian Complex (e.g., Tribuzio et al 2000) and Masirah, Oman (Rollinson, 2017). However, although classifications such as these, based on detailed consideration of magma petrogenesis and tectonic context, are useful, it is also important to remember that individual ophiolite complexes may preserve evidence of episodes of magmatism in differing settings (e.g., Melcher et al, 1997;Schulte et al, 2009;Goodenough et al, 2014;O'Driscoll et al, 2015;Derbyshire et al, 2019).…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%