2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic retention behaviour of monosubstituted benzene derivatives on porous graphitic carbon and octadecyl-bonded silica studied using molecular modelling and quantitative structure–retention relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) constitutes an interesting option, as it has been shown to separate highly polar or charged analytes (Pereira 2008;Michel and Buszewski 2009) and structurally closely related species, such as isomers (Gundersen 2001;De Matteis et al 2012). PGC consists of planar, two-dimensional sheets composed of hexagonally arranged carbon atoms where each sp 2 hybridized carbon is joined to three adjacent carbons, creating an extensive polyaromatic scaffold (West et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous graphitic carbon (PGC) constitutes an interesting option, as it has been shown to separate highly polar or charged analytes (Pereira 2008;Michel and Buszewski 2009) and structurally closely related species, such as isomers (Gundersen 2001;De Matteis et al 2012). PGC consists of planar, two-dimensional sheets composed of hexagonally arranged carbon atoms where each sp 2 hybridized carbon is joined to three adjacent carbons, creating an extensive polyaromatic scaffold (West et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonpolar analytes interact with the PGC surface via dispersive forces while polar ones are retained via charge induction on the polarizable PGC surface. The mobile phase is a major determinant of retention because it influences the ionization state of both analytes and the PGC surface . We hypothesized that failure to maintain the same PGC surface before and after running a gradient is a cause of the observed retention loss/variability on PGC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional groups of acidic glycans, phosphates and carboxyls, are readily deprotonated at pH 5.5 and bind more strongly to the instant dipoles of graphite (Figure S-4). ,, We could detach acidic glycans from PGC by the addition of low pH solvent, promoting the protonation of negatively charged species. Finally, different types of acidic glycans such as phosphorylated and sialylated glycans were also fractionated by simply changing the SPE solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%