2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic response functions in 1D and 2D chromatography as tools for assessing chemical complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated values of a CRF can be useful for quickly assessing the quality of a separation. Interested readers are referred to a review on CRFs by Matos et al [279].…”
Section: Chromatographic Response Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated values of a CRF can be useful for quickly assessing the quality of a separation. Interested readers are referred to a review on CRFs by Matos et al [279].…”
Section: Chromatographic Response Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study on the performance of resolution criterion to characterize complex chromatograms 1D separations 2017 [277] A chromatographic objective function to characterize chromatograms, peak prominence 1D separations 2015 [276] Assessment of 2D separative systems using the nearest neighbour distances approach. Part 2: Separation quality aspect 2D separations 2013 [255] Universal comparison of CRFs LC 2014 [232] A new CRF for assessing the separation quality in LC × LC LC × LC 2012 [99] CRFs in 1D and 2D chromatography as tools for assessing chemical complexity Review 2013 [279] Stationary phase selection…”
Section: Title Subcategory Year Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another choice was to optimize the target chromatogram with an iterative technique and constrained conditions of peaks, such as unimodality and non-negativity [55,56]. Among the mathematical models to simulate the chromatogram, the polynomial modified Gaussian (PMG) function has been found most suitable to derive each eluting component [51,57]. Non-linear regression techniques for deconvolution were reviewed by Vivo-Truyols et al [58], who proposed a new algorithm for alternative fitting of the original signal and the second derivatives.…”
Section: Gc×gc Data Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical part of any optimization strategy is a clear denition of the goal(s) of the process that can be summarized in the denition of the optimization criterion. [13][14][15] The quality and exibility of the criteria are among the signicant factors determining the applicability of selectivityoptimization procedures. Indeed, the result of an optimization process depends on the selected optimization criterion, so that the latter has to be dened in the context of the objectives of the separations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these criteria are dened on the chromatograms recorded by single-channel detectors, such as ame ionization detector (FID), single wavelength UV, electron capture detector (ECD), and with this assumption that all the solutes must be separated. 14,15 In general, traditional separation criteria for chromatographic systems coupled to single-channel detectors fall into two groups, namely elementary and overall criteria. Elementary criteria describe the separation between two adjacent peaks, and overall criteria concern the resolution of the entire chromatogram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%