2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00745-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic characterisation of an estrogen-binding affinity column containing tetrapeptides selected by a combinatorial-binding approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These beads were also suitable for the synthesis work because of their large size (16-50 mesh) and their easiness to handle and separate. Also, this solid phase gave good results in liquid chromatography [10] and so these characteristics made the beads a suitable solid phase for packing SPE columns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These beads were also suitable for the synthesis work because of their large size (16-50 mesh) and their easiness to handle and separate. Also, this solid phase gave good results in liquid chromatography [10] and so these characteristics made the beads a suitable solid phase for packing SPE columns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All the binding constants increased; moreover, we have to underline that the selectivities showed by the tetrapeptide agreed with the ones reported for a commercial antibody (third and fourth columns), although aflatoxin G 1 showed a binding constant similar to the one obtained for the dipeptide and therefore gave a lower selectivity. Furthermore, we could be quite optimistic about the binding properties of the tetrapeptide towards aflatoxins B 1 and B 2 as they showed a binding constant higher than 10 4 M -1 that could be sufficient for retaining the analytes in solution [10]; whereas we had to doubt the capacity of the tetrapeptide to bind the other two aflatoxins that showed slightly lower binding constants, above all for aflatoxin G 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the analytical techniques are much more specific and sensitive, they are not affordable for most laboratories because of their specialty requirement, sophisticated sample preparation (from few hours to overnight hydrolysis), and the high cost of equipment. Other procedures use immunoaffinity [2, 29 -32], molecularly imprint [33], and tetrapeptide solid extraction phase columns [34]. However, their scope of application is limited to several compounds, and does not cover all hormones and hormonelike substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%