2013
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin modifications and the DNA damage response to ionizing radiation

Abstract: In order to survive, cells have evolved highly effective repair mechanisms to deal with the potentially lethal DNA damage produced by exposure to endogenous as well as exogenous agents. Ionizing radiation exposure induces highly lethal DNA damage, especially DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), that is sensed by the cellular machinery and then subsequently repaired by either of two different DSB repair mechanisms: (1) non-homologous end joining, which re-ligates the broken ends of the DNA and (2) homologous recomb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the histone acetyltransferases CBP and p300, known AR coactivators, promote expression of the HR genes BRCA1 and RAD51 [55], indicating that AR likely utilizes a distinct cohort of cofactors to alter gene expression after DNA damage. Finally, post-translational modifications of nucleosomes are known to influence DDR [56], and it is also tempting to speculate that AR may be recruited to genes that promote DDR via altered histone modification. Combined, these collective studies strongly suggest that DNA damage-induced transcription factor activation plays a major role in DDR and the cellular response to genotoxic damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the histone acetyltransferases CBP and p300, known AR coactivators, promote expression of the HR genes BRCA1 and RAD51 [55], indicating that AR likely utilizes a distinct cohort of cofactors to alter gene expression after DNA damage. Finally, post-translational modifications of nucleosomes are known to influence DDR [56], and it is also tempting to speculate that AR may be recruited to genes that promote DDR via altered histone modification. Combined, these collective studies strongly suggest that DNA damage-induced transcription factor activation plays a major role in DDR and the cellular response to genotoxic damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-stranded break (DSB) is the most lethal form of DNA damage, which is primarily repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) (62, 63). NHEJ can occur throughout the cell cycle – predominantly in G1 but also in the S and G2 phases when repair by homologous recombination (HR) is also possible.…”
Section: Dna Damage Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the components of the ATP-dependent SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling complex BRG1 and BRM (also known as SMARCA4 and SMARCA2, respectively) have been implicated in the transcriptional regulation of UV-induced genes (Hassan et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014). Furthermore, many posttranslational histone modifications have been shown to be modulated during the cellular response to DNA damage (Corpet and Almouzni, 2009;Kumar et al, 2012;Li et al, 2014;Tjeertes et al, 2009). For example, following UV exposure, the histone acetyltransferase p300 (also known as EP300) is recruited close to the MMP-1 promoter, regulating MMP-1 transcription by its catalytic activity (Kim et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%