2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin jets define the properties of cohesin-driven in vivo loop extrusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
6
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results could explain an observation in recent simulations, which demonstrated that forces exerted by bound molecular motors can bend polymers into hairpins (67). Such zipped structures also arise in Hi-C maps (93)(94)(95) and in our simulated contact maps as jet-like, anti-diagonal features originating from small A regions and extending into the neighboring B compartment [Fig. 2D].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results could explain an observation in recent simulations, which demonstrated that forces exerted by bound molecular motors can bend polymers into hairpins (67). Such zipped structures also arise in Hi-C maps (93)(94)(95) and in our simulated contact maps as jet-like, anti-diagonal features originating from small A regions and extending into the neighboring B compartment [Fig. 2D].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…2D]. Experiments suggest that these structures could be formed by active loop extrusion (93), which is not explicitly accounted for in our model. Nevertheless, it is interesting that the spontaneous loops induced by a local hot spot of activity could still create jet-like features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless stated otherwise, we assumed that extrusion began at t = 333 s after the start of the recorded simulation trajectories and proceeded at a nominal speed of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}${V}_0 = 1$\end{document} kb/s ( 17 ). As soon as the extrusion complex reached one of the two anchors, it stopped, and the other side of the chain continued to be extruded unidirectionally ( 18 , 50 , 51 ), at a speed of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}${{\rm{V}}}_0/2$\end{document} ( 26 ), until the extrusion complex reached the second anchor ( Supplementary Figure S2A ). At this point, extrusion stopped entirely, and the two anchors were maintained in the closed state until the end of the simulation, unless stated otherwise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed of loop extrusion (in base pairs per seconds) is thus defined as \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}${V}_0 = {\rm{\ }}2g/\Delta t.$\end{document} By default, our simulations assumed that extrusion started at a random location between the beads representing the anchors (extrusion barriers) and proceeded bidirectionally at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$V_0 =$\end{document} 1 kb/s ( 17 , 26 ) until reaching an anchor. Thereafter, loop extrusion proceeded unidirectionally, at the halved speed \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$V_0/2{\rm{\ }} = {\rm{\ }}0.5$\end{document} kb/s until reaching the second anchor ( 18 , 50–52 ), whereupon extrusion stopped ( Supplementary Figure S2A ). By default, we then maintained the bond between the two anchor beads until the end of the simulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5A). Chromatin jets describe a recently identified Hi-C signature observed at some locally dominant cohesin loading sites that reflect bouquets of unanchored, bi-directionally extruding cohesin molecules that all initiated extrusion at the same site 29 . In contrast, stripes are normally observed at strong CTCF boundaries 12,30 and are believed to reflect differently sized chromatin loops formed by uni-directional extruding cohesin molecules anchored at the same site.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%