2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin Controls DNA Replication Origin Selection, Lagging-Strand Synthesis, and Replication Fork Rates

Abstract: SummaryThe integrity of eukaryotic genomes requires rapid and regulated chromatin replication. How this is accomplished is still poorly understood. Using purified yeast replication proteins and fully chromatinized templates, we have reconstituted this process in vitro. We show that chromatin enforces DNA replication origin specificity by preventing non-specific MCM helicase loading. Helicase activation occurs efficiently in the context of chromatin, but subsequent replisome progression requires the histone cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
253
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
14
253
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even at the highest concentration of Pol α tested, lagging-strand products were longer than the ∼165 nucleotides that have been measured in vivo (Smith and Whitehouse, 2012). These experiments were conducted on naked DNA templates, and in the accompanying manuscript, we show that chromatin profoundly affects lagging-strand product sizes (Kurat et al., 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Even at the highest concentration of Pol α tested, lagging-strand products were longer than the ∼165 nucleotides that have been measured in vivo (Smith and Whitehouse, 2012). These experiments were conducted on naked DNA templates, and in the accompanying manuscript, we show that chromatin profoundly affects lagging-strand product sizes (Kurat et al., 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…S1B), yielding a diploid strain that produces yeast CMG. A similar method was recently used to produce the 15-member Ino80 complex (40). Purification strategies involved FLAG affinity [to capture FLAG-Mcm3/Cdc45 internal FLAG , strain yJCZ2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the S-phase-extract-based assay, ISW1a templates showed reduced replication using the fully-reconstituted assay (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A), most likely due to a lack of CREs and histone chaperones present in the S-phase-extract-based assay (Devbhandari et al, 2017; Kurat et al, 2017). Nevertheless, replication of the SWI/SNF and RSC templates was similarly reduced relative to their ISW1a-remodeled counterpart using the reconstituted assay (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%