1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81212-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin changes in cell transformation: progressive unfolding of the higher-order structure during the evolution of rat hepatocyte nodules. A differential scanning calorimetry study

Abstract: Using differential scanning calorimetry and complementary ultrastructural observations, we have characterized the status of chromatin during the transformation of rat hepatocytes in the resistant hepatocyte model of Solt and Farber (1976. Nature (Lond.). 263:701-703). Differential scanning calorimetry affords a measure of the degree of condensation of chromatin in situ and has therefore been used in this work for the purpose of establishing the nature of the structural changes associated with the emergence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its sharp subdivision into two basic supramolecular domains (the linker and the core particle) the polynucleosomal chain lends itself to conformational studies by DSC. Therefore, this technique is a powerful tool for investigating the overall organization of chromatin in situ (10,12,13,(25)(26)(27). The thermal denaturation profile of interphase nuclei shows two major heat absorption peaks (labeled IV and V in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its sharp subdivision into two basic supramolecular domains (the linker and the core particle) the polynucleosomal chain lends itself to conformational studies by DSC. Therefore, this technique is a powerful tool for investigating the overall organization of chromatin in situ (10,12,13,(25)(26)(27). The thermal denaturation profile of interphase nuclei shows two major heat absorption peaks (labeled IV and V in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclei were obtained by incubation of the pelleted cells in dissociation medium (DM) (75 mM NaCl, 24 mM Na 2 EDTA, 5 mM NaHSO 3 , and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.8) containing 0.15% (v/v) Triton X-100, following the procedure already employed for calf thymus (12); in the digestion experiments nuclei were incubated at 37°C for 3 h with 50 units/ml micrococcal nuclease (Sigma) according to Russo et al (10). For electron microscopy of thin sections, control, glucocorticoid-treated cells, and nuclei were pelleted at 150 ϫ g for 10 min; fixation, embedding, and sectioning were performed as already reported (13). DNA was isolated by digestion of purified nuclei with proteinase K (Serva) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, pH 8.0, followed by extraction with phenol and chloroform, and the chain length distribution of the fragments was analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental studies point to progressive unfolding of the chromatin structure in anomalously proliferating (cancer) cells (19,20), which could be associated with PANS formation. Recent genome-wide studies revealed an existence of widespread subnucleosomal structures in dynamic chromatin of living cell (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer is no. We recall that transition IV results from the melting of the core particles placed within an extended (euchromatin) domain [Balbi et al, 1989]; this subpopulation does not undergo salt induced condensation, as a consequence of the binding of trans active factors and/or of specific interactions with the nuclear matrix [Barboro et al, 1993]. The amount of euchromatin is expected to be related within the number of genes which are at work in a given cell type; since this number is almost the same in all of resting cells, we can explain why DH m IV represents a fixed fraction ($0.3) of the total denaturation enthalpy of nuclear chromatin [Cavazza et al, 1991].…”
Section: Vamentioning
confidence: 99%