Chromalveolate plastids: direct descent or multiple endosymbioses?

419

444

The discovery of a nonphotosynthetic plastid in malaria and other apicomplexan parasites has sparked a contentious debate about its evolutionary origin. Molecular data have led to conflicting conclusions supporting either its green algal origin or red algal origin, perhaps in common with the plastid of related dinoflagellates. This distinction is critical to our understanding of apicomplexan evolution and the evolutionary history of endosymbiosis and photosynthesis; however, the two plastids are nearly impossible to compare due to their nonoverlapping information content. Here we describe the complete plastid genome sequences and plastid-associated data from two independent photosynthetic lineages represented by Chromera velia and an undescribed alga CCMP3155 that we show are closely related to apicomplexans. These plastids contain a suite of features retained in either apicomplexan (four plastid membranes, the ribosomal superoperon, conserved gene order) or dinoflagellate plastids (form II Rubisco acquired by horizontal transfer, transcript polyuridylylation, thylakoids stacked in triplets) and encode a full collective complement of their reduced gene sets. Together with whole plastid genome phylogenies, these characteristics provide multiple lines of evidence that the extant plastids of apicomplexans and dinoflagellates were inherited by linear descent from a common red algal endosymbiont. Our phylogenetic analyses also support their close relationship to plastids of heterokont algae, indicating they all derive from the same endosymbiosis. Altogether, these findings support a relatively simple path of linear descent for the evolution of photosynthesis in a large proportion of algae and emphasize plastid loss in several lineages (e.g., ciliates, Cryptosporidium, and Phytophthora).Apicomplexa | Chromera velia | CCMP3155 | plastid evolution | chloroplast genome

Section: Plastid Phylogeny Supports a Common Origin Of Alveolate Andcontrasting

confidence: 53%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A common red algal origin of the apicomplexan, dinoflagellate, and heterokont plastids

Janouškovec

Horák

Oborník

et al. 2010

419

444

“…Photosynthesis has been lost multiple times in the group (7), but how many times and whether plastids were retained in nonphotosynthetic species are unknown. Myzozoans are a potentially useful system for characterizing the still mysterious forces that control plastid retention and loss in general (8). There is now evidence for the retention of plastid-derived genes in some nonphotosynthetic myzozoans (9,10), but plastid distribution alone is of a limited benefit.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors mediating plastid dependency and the origins of parasitism in apicomplexans and their close relatives

Janouškovec

Tikhonenkov

Burki

et al. 2015

165

189

Apicomplexans are a major lineage of parasites, including causative agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis. How such highly adapted parasites evolved from free-living ancestors is poorly understood, particularly because they contain nonphotosynthetic plastids with which they have a complex metabolic dependency. Here, we examine the origin of apicomplexan parasitism by resolving the evolutionary distribution of several key characteristics in their closest free-living relatives, photosynthetic chromerids and predatory colpodellids. Using environmental sequence data, we describe the diversity of these apicomplexan-related lineages and select five species that represent this diversity for transcriptome sequencing. Phylogenomic analysis recovered a monophyletic lineage of chromerids and colpodellids as the sister group to apicomplexans, and a complex distribution of retention versus loss for photosynthesis, plastid genomes, and plastid organelles. Reconstructing the evolution of all plastid and cytosolic metabolic pathways related to apicomplexan plastid function revealed an ancient dependency on plastid isoprenoid biosynthesis, predating the divergence of apicomplexan and dinoflagellates. Similarly, plastid genome retention is strongly linked to the retention of two genes in the plastid genome, sufB and clpC, altogether suggesting a relatively simple model for plastid retention and loss. Lastly, we examine the broader distribution of a suite of molecular characteristics previously linked to the origins of apicomplexan parasitism and find that virtually all are present in their free-living relatives. The emergence of parasitism may not be driven by acquisition of novel components, but rather by loss and modification of the existing, conserved traits.A picomplexans are globally important parasites of humans and animals that include Plasmodium (malaria), Toxoplasma (toxoplasmosis), and Cryptosporidium (cryptosporidiosis). Their success as parasites rests on several highly specialized structures and systems that enable them to gain entry to and divide within cells or tissues of their hosts. These structures include the multimembrane pellicle, a relict nonphotosynthetic plastid (absent in Cryptosporidium), and the apical complex, which is made up of cytoskeletal and secretory elements (e.g., the conoid and rhoptries, respectively). Many specific characteristics of apicomplexans make attractive drug targets, and others may have played a key role in the origin of parasitism. Indeed, the question of apicomplexan origins has been of interest in general but is challenged by a paucity of comparable information from free-living relatives. Several apicomplexan relatives are known, some photosynthetic and others predatory (1, 2), but we lack a comprehensive understanding of their biology because they have either been discovered only recently, or are difficult to establish and maintain in culture. In general, photosynthetic apicomplexan relatives are referred to as chromerids (including Chromera and Vitrella) (1, 3) whereas predators...

“…Not everyone is so sure, however (e.g., refs. 12 and 13), and indeed we know that plastids have moved horizontally by endosymbiotic mergers involving unrelated eukaryotic donors and recipients (3,(14)(15)(16). Precisely how, and how many times, photosynthesis has spread among eukaryotes has been debated ever since the idea was first proposed in the 1970s (17,18).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Genomic perspectives on the birth and spread of plastids

Archibald

2015

114

113

The endosymbiotic origin of plastids from cyanobacteria was a landmark event in the history of eukaryotic life. Subsequent to the evolution of primary plastids, photosynthesis spread from red and green algae to unrelated eukaryotes by secondary and tertiary endosymbiosis. Although the movement of cyanobacterial genes from endosymbiont to host is well studied, less is known about the migration of eukaryotic genes from one nucleus to the other in the context of serial endosymbiosis. Here I explore the magnitude and potential impact of nucleus-to-nucleus endosymbiotic gene transfer in the evolution of complex algae, and the extent to which such transfers compromise our ability to infer the deep structure of the eukaryotic tree of life. In addition to endosymbiotic gene transfer, horizontal gene transfer events occurring before, during, and after endosymbioses further confound our efforts to reconstruct the ancient mergers that forged multiple lines of photosynthetic microbial eukaryotes.