2015
DOI: 10.1177/0008429815595810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Christian Origins and Religious Studies

Abstract: This essay reflects on the relationship between the study of the origins of Christianity and the discipline of Religious Studies in conversation with William Arnal’s “What Branches Grow out of this Stony Rubbish? Christian Origins and the Study of Religion,” published in Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses in 2010. Extending Arnal’s call for specialists in the New Testament and early Christianity to engage Religious Studies, it explores a reorientation of perspective, towards the aim of a doubled lens f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crux of their joint statement was the rejection of any political, religious, or ideological agenda and acceptance of objective and scientific inquiry as to the sole purpose of the academics working in this field (Schimmel 1960;McCutcheon 1996). However, concerns like a poor representation of different cultural perspectives and regional contexts (Pye 1989;Geertz 2000;Wiebe 2012) and male dominance of the field (Joy 2005;Reed 2015) could not be pacified. Similarly, the purported connection of religious studies to orientalism (Whaling 1995), colonialism (Hedges 2008;Tayob 2018), and Christian theology (Neville 1993;Milbank 2004) continued to haunt the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crux of their joint statement was the rejection of any political, religious, or ideological agenda and acceptance of objective and scientific inquiry as to the sole purpose of the academics working in this field (Schimmel 1960;McCutcheon 1996). However, concerns like a poor representation of different cultural perspectives and regional contexts (Pye 1989;Geertz 2000;Wiebe 2012) and male dominance of the field (Joy 2005;Reed 2015) could not be pacified. Similarly, the purported connection of religious studies to orientalism (Whaling 1995), colonialism (Hedges 2008;Tayob 2018), and Christian theology (Neville 1993;Milbank 2004) continued to haunt the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%