2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl072701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chorus whistler wave source scales as determined from multipoint Van Allen Probe measurements

Abstract: Whistler mode chorus waves are particularly important in outer radiation belt dynamics due to their key role in controlling the acceleration and scattering of electrons over a very wide energy range. The key parameters for both nonlinear and quasi‐linear treatment of wave‐particle interactions are the temporal and spatial scales of the wave source region and coherence of the wave field perturbations. Neither the source scale nor the coherence scale is well established experimentally, mostly because of a lack o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

23
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
23
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated transverse (radial and longitudinal directions) size of the wave-particle interaction region (900-km diameter) was comparable to the source size for a coherent chorus element reported by recent Van Allen Probes observations (Agapitov et al, 2017). Intensity modulations of a pulsating aurora are clearly related to successive discrete chorus elements and also possibly associated with chorus subpacket structures at a time scale of tens of milliseconds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimated transverse (radial and longitudinal directions) size of the wave-particle interaction region (900-km diameter) was comparable to the source size for a coherent chorus element reported by recent Van Allen Probes observations (Agapitov et al, 2017). Intensity modulations of a pulsating aurora are clearly related to successive discrete chorus elements and also possibly associated with chorus subpacket structures at a time scale of tens of milliseconds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Using this projection, the source size at the magnetic equator was estimated to be approximately 900 km in diameter in the radial and longitudinal directions. The source size of the wave-particle interaction (900-km diameter) estimated from the auroral patch in this study is almost the same as the chorus source size determined by recent Van Allen Probes satellite observations (Agapitov et al, 2017). Thus, the horizontal patch size is much larger than the Larmor radius for energetic electrons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The azimuthal scale size (longitudinal scale mapped from LEO) of 555‐keV electrons was greater than 450 ± 10 km, and for the 771‐keV electrons it was greater than 530 ± 10 km. The lower bound microburst scale size is similar to the chorus scale sizes derived by Agapitov et al, (, ) and is discussed bellow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The absolute value of the transverse (cross‐field) separation at the 500 km altitude of FIREBIRD is plotted in Figure e and is as low as 60 km. This small separation means that both satellites are contained within a larger flux tube defined by a single chorus wave packet, which has a typical transverse size of ∼100–800 km at the equator at L = 4–6 in different case studies (Agapitov et al, , ; Santolík & Gurnett, ; Santolík et al, ). These are the first published observations of simultaneous chorus and microbursts with a separation smaller than a chorus packet.…”
Section: Conjunction and Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%