2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2014.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHOROS 2: Improving the Performance of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning in OWL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We worked with the first 1,000 data set records referring to positions of 20 ships at various time instances. The CHRONOS [2] and CHOROS [34] reasoners are applied for inferring all implied spatiotemporal relations (including spatial relations between any two ships) and checking the ontology for consistency. All inferred relations are instantiated in the ontology, resulting in an ontology with 2,113,835 triples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We worked with the first 1,000 data set records referring to positions of 20 ships at various time instances. The CHRONOS [2] and CHOROS [34] reasoners are applied for inferring all implied spatiotemporal relations (including spatial relations between any two ships) and checking the ontology for consistency. All inferred relations are instantiated in the ontology, resulting in an ontology with 2,113,835 triples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the problem of efficiency, reasoning in SOWL QL resorts to CHOROS [34] and CHRONOS [2] reasoners for temporal and spatial information, respectively. CHOROS is a dedicated spatial reasoner for directional CSD-9 or RCC-8 relations implemented in Java.…”
Section: Reasoning In Sowl Qlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, reasoning systems, such as Pelletspatial (Stocker and Sirin, 2009), CHOROS (Christodoulou et al, 2012) or its next version CHOROS 2.0 (Mainas et al, 2014) improving the run-time performance, extract spatial relations from a knowledge base and reason over both these topological and directional relations. However, reasoning through specialised software also complicates the system reusability and data sharing (Batsakis and Antoniou, 2014).…”
Section: Spatial Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%