Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Tubular Structures(ISTS17) 2019
DOI: 10.3850/978-981-11-0745-0_050-cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chord Stress Effect in High-Strength Steel Tubular X-Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chord preload ( N 0 ) was included in the chord stress, but the chord axial stress resulting from the lateral brace loading ( N ) was negligibly small and thus excluded. Although some chord cross-sections fall within Class 3, the chord stress level ( n 0 ) for all joints was determined on the basis of full plastic capacities, i.e., f y0 A 0 and f y0 W pl,0 , following the observation made by Kim et al (2019); the chord stress effect in high strength steel CHS X-joints with Class 3 or 4 cross-sections was shown to be comparable to that in geometrically identical mild steel joints with Class 2 cross-sections.
Figure 11.Chord stress level ( n 0 ) in IPB-loaded joints. (a) X-joint.
…”
Section: Test Results Of Chs Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chord preload ( N 0 ) was included in the chord stress, but the chord axial stress resulting from the lateral brace loading ( N ) was negligibly small and thus excluded. Although some chord cross-sections fall within Class 3, the chord stress level ( n 0 ) for all joints was determined on the basis of full plastic capacities, i.e., f y0 A 0 and f y0 W pl,0 , following the observation made by Kim et al (2019); the chord stress effect in high strength steel CHS X-joints with Class 3 or 4 cross-sections was shown to be comparable to that in geometrically identical mild steel joints with Class 2 cross-sections.
Figure 11.Chord stress level ( n 0 ) in IPB-loaded joints. (a) X-joint.
…”
Section: Test Results Of Chs Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation hinders the use of many HSS hollow sections with a practical diameter (or width, in the case of rectangular hollow sections) to thickness ratios. Kim et al [17] found that the current EN 1993-1-8 compactness requirement could be waived for many HSS CHS joints. The compactness issue is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%