Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy decision-making to prevent soil erosion

q ‐Rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation and its application in heterogeneous multicriteria two‐sided matching decision making

“…All of the three banks are concerned about the entrepreneur's expected volume of the loan (b 1,1 , b 2,1 , b 3,1 ), the entrepreneur's capital structure (b 1,2 , b 2,2 , b 3,2 ), and the entrepreneur's former credit (b 1,3 , b 2,3 , b 3,3 ). B 3 also intends to assess the length of the loan (b 3,4 ). All criteria are benefit type.…”

“…The Choquet integral is an effective tool to aggregate information by considering the relative importance of decision criteria and their interrelationships. It has been wildly discussed under different decision‐making environments, where Choquet integral are remarkable in the fuzzy environment . For example, based on the research on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), Wu et al introduced the integration properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral and its adaption in the multicriteria decision making.…”

“…It has been wildly discussed under different decision-making environments, where Choquet integral are remarkable in the fuzzy environment. [2][3][4][5][6] For example, based on the research on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), 7 Wu et al 8 introduced the integration properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral and its adaption in the multicriteria decision making. Büyüközkan et al 9 utilized the Choquet integral for selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives.…”

A perceptual computing–based method to prioritize intervention actions in the probabilistic risk assessment techniques

“…However, all aforementioned methods are based on decision makers' opinions, and accordingly, subjectivity is the main part of MCDM techniques. The interaction relationships between multiple risk factors in earthquake vulnerability assessment process are analyzed by Moradi et al, 42 finding the best applicable solution dealing with soil erosion in Turkey, 43 and screening the geological CO 2 storage sites. Besides, the feasibility of obtained results by these methods is questionable due to fact that there is no evidence to show that the priority of alternatives by these methods is optimum.…”

“…[39][40][41] Some engineering applications have been done by many scholars as follows. The interaction relationships between multiple risk factors in earthquake vulnerability assessment process are analyzed by Moradi et al, 42 finding the best applicable solution dealing with soil erosion in Turkey, 43 and screening the geological CO 2 storage sites. 44 The purpose of this research is acquiring a proper priority ranking of corrective actions as an intervention activity in a typical probabilistic risk assessment technique using MULTIMOORA approach with the Choquet integral under subjectivity circumstances.…”