The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1177/107110070402500512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chopart Joint Fracture-Dislocation: Initial Open Reduction Provides Better Outcome than Closed Reduction

Abstract: Injury cause, treatment, and long-term results [American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score, Hannover Scoring System, Hannover Outcome Questionnaire] of patients with Chopart joint dislocations or fracture-dislocations were evaluated. Between 1972 and 1997, 100 patients with 110 Chopart joint dislocations were treated in the authors' institution. Pure Chopart joint dislocations were observed in 28 (25%) feet, fracture-dislocations in 60 (55%) feet, and combined Chopart-Lisfranc joint frac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
55
2
18

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
55
2
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Early anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and ligament reconstruction could have achieved a better outcome. [9][10][11] Closed reduction yields good results only in cases of pure dislocation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early anatomic reduction, stable fixation, and ligament reconstruction could have achieved a better outcome. [9][10][11] Closed reduction yields good results only in cases of pure dislocation …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early anatomical reduction and stable fixation has been shown to improve the clinical results in other types of midfoot dislocation. 7,8 In the present case, a closed anatomical reduction was achieved using percutaneous screws to minimise surgical trauma to the soft tissue. The screws were kept in place for a longer period (14 weeks) than that suggested by Richter et al (6-10 weeks), 7,8 because considerably more soft tissue was involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 In the present case, a closed anatomical reduction was achieved using percutaneous screws to minimise surgical trauma to the soft tissue. The screws were kept in place for a longer period (14 weeks) than that suggested by Richter et al (6-10 weeks), 7,8 because considerably more soft tissue was involved. Nonetheless, residual insufficiency of plantar ligamentous structures occurred, resulting in plantar opening up of the joint space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients managed without surgery had significantly poorer outcomes that those managed with any surgical technique. 83 As with other midfoot injuries, Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal) injuries can produce significant problems if left untreated. Reduction of the joints often requires a dual-incision approach with the medial incision centered over the first Web space, and extended proximally, while the lateral incision is centered over the proximal half of the fourth metatarsal shaft.…”
Section: Foot Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%