Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: Five opportunities for improved healthcare value

Abstract

BACKGROUND In an effort to lead physicians in addressing the problem of overuse of medical tests and treatments, the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation developed the Choosing Wisely campaign. The Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) joined the initiative to highlight the need to critically appraise resource utilization in hospitals. METHODS The SHM employed a staged methodology to develop the adult Choosing Wisely list. This included surveys of the organization's leaders and general membership, a review of the literature, and Delphi panel voting. RESULTS The 5 recommendations that were subsequently approved by the SHM Board are: (1) Do not place, or leave in place, urinary catheters for incontinence or convenience or monitoring of output for non–critically ill patients (acceptable indications: critical illness, obstruction, hospice, perioperatively for <2 days for urologic procedures; use weights instead to monitor diuresis). (2) Do not prescribe medications for stress ulcer prophylaxis to medical inpatients unless at high risk for gastrointestinal complications. (3) Avoid transfusions of red blood cells for arbitrary hemoglobin or hematocrit thresholds and in the absence of symptoms or active coronary disease, heart failure, or stroke. (4) Do not order continuous telemetry monitoring outside of the intensive care unit without using a protocol that governs continuation. (5) Do not perform repetitive complete blood count and chemistry testing in the face of clinical and lab stability. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalists have many opportunities to impact overutilization of care. The adult hospital medicine Choosing Wisely recommendations offer an explicit starting point for eliminating waste in the hospital. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:486–492. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine

Criteria for Reducing Unnecessary Testing for Herpes Simplex Virus, Varicella-Zoster Virus, Cytomegalovirus, and Enterovirus in Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples from Adults

“…In conclusion, there are critical demands for health care cost containment and quality improvement (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Establishing laboratory acceptance criteria for viral NAAT of CSF samples is one example of an approach to both reducing costs and improving patient care by reducing unnecessary testing and its associated consequences.…”

Perceived Safety and Value of Inpatient “Very Important Person” Services

“…Some have speculated that the presence of a VIP patient may be disruptive to the care of non-VIP patients, while others have cautioned physicians about potential dangers to the VIP patients themselves. [4][5][6] Despite much being written on the topics of VIP patients and services in both the lay and academic press, our literature review identified only 1 study on the topic, which cataloged the preferential treatment of VIP patients in the emergency department. 6 We are unaware of any investigations of VIP-service use in the inpatient setting.…”

Choosing wisely: The Canadian Thoracic Society's list of six things that physicians and patients should question

“…We adapted an existing framework developed on the basis of evidentiary rationales identified in a review of 25 societies' Choosing Wisely lists 10 and considered criteria used by other societies [11][12][13] and guidance provided by Choosing Wisely Canada.…”