2017
DOI: 10.1515/jag-2016-0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing the optimal number of B-spline control points (Part 2: Approximation of surfaces and applications)

Abstract: Freeform surfaces like B-splines have proven to be a suitable tool to model laser scanner point clouds and to form the basis for an areal data analysis, for example an areal deformation analysis.A variety of parameters determine the B-spline's appearance, the B-spline's complexity being mostly determined by the number of control points. Usually, this parameter type is chosen by intuitive trial-and-error-procedures.In [The present paper continues these investigations. If necessary, the methods proposed in [The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since previous geodetic literatures [21,22,28] has solved the model selection problem through well-known penalization information criteria: the AIC and BIC, it is necessary in this section to compare Vuong's non-nested hypothesis test with this widely used approach. It is noticeable that there are close connections between AIC, BIC, and Vuong's test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since previous geodetic literatures [21,22,28] has solved the model selection problem through well-known penalization information criteria: the AIC and BIC, it is necessary in this section to compare Vuong's non-nested hypothesis test with this widely used approach. It is noticeable that there are close connections between AIC, BIC, and Vuong's test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation serves as the motivation for discriminating between estimated surface models in order to select the most appropriate one. In the context of model selection, Harmening and Neuner [21,22] investigated statistical methods based on information criteria and statistical learning theory for selecting the optimal number of control points within B-spline surface estimation. Another possibility is to compare the (log-)likelihoods of competing models directly by means of the general testing principle by D.R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal number of control points to be estimated can be interpreted as a model selection problem and can either be solved by classical model selection strategies or by structural risk minimisation (cf. [34,35]). The latter strategy has the advantage that the degrees p and q can also be taken into account during model selection, rather than choosing them arbitrarily [36].…”
Section: Non-distorted Regions and Final Transformation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the proposed approach of a stochastic modelling of the deformation offers two advantages: on the one hand, the challenge of a consistent surface parametrization, which is necessary to compare different B-spline surfaces (cf. Harmening and Neuner 2017), is circumvented. On the other hand, only in a unified B-spline-based framework for handling rigid body movements and distortions, the former can be a-priori eliminated according to Harmening and Neuner (2016b).…”
Section: Basic Ideas Of the Developed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%