“…More specifically, SmartPLS 3 [116,117] was used to estimate the research model (for detailed reasons of why and when to use PLS-SEM, see for example, Richter, Cepeda, Roldán, & Ringle [118]). Despite a surprising level of animosity towards PLS-SEM [118][119][120][121], PLS-SEM has been widely accepted by the scholarly community, including authors, reviewers, and editors [122][123][124][125]. The following points summarize why this study adopted PLS-SEM instead of Linear structural relations (LISREL) or Analysis of a moment structures (AMOS) as more suitable statistical techniques: (1) the structural model is complex, and contains four series of dependent relationships [118,126]; (2) the research objective of the structural model is prediction oriented, and explaining the variance in key target constructs [126,127]; (3) this study analyzes the relationships between managerial capability, adaptive capability, and organizational innovation; which is being considered in the initial stages of theory development, therefore motivated us to investigate the related phenomena in this emerging area [118]; (4) the sample size (n = 210) is also believed to be relatively small [127], finally; (5) this study also takes advantage of PLS-SEM in terms of its less rigorous requirements for restrictive assumptions, which motivates researchers to develop and estimate such models through enabling them to avoid additional limiting constraints [117,128].…”