Choosing Peace Instead of War. A Lesson from Athenian Democracy

Abstract

The present essay discusses how a society can make decisions on specific issues according to how flexible or rigid it is in accepting new ideas and trends. Then, it explains how Athenian society abandoned war in favor of a grand peace strategy during the second half of the 4th century BCE. To achieve this, two visionary Athenian policymakers, Eubulus and Lycurgus, introduced fiscal expansionary policy programs which proved beneficial for the majority of the citizens. Through expansionary public works programs, Athenian citizens were now able to make decisions based on rational choices, based on a wider economic prospective. They could now gain more during periods of peace (as traders, ship-owners, “industrialists” etc.), providing compensation to the poor.

Collective Action Problems and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of Georgia’s 2010 Trauma Care Funding Amendment

“…3 In a related paper, Economou and Kyriazis (2016) show how expansionary public works programs in ancient Athens led Athenian citizens to adopt a wider economic perspective whng. 4 We implicitly assume that voter turnout in response to the referendum is the same across all counties.…”

Democracy without political parties: the case of ancient Athens

“…Aristophanes (in Ecclesiazusae : 197 18 ) declares: ‘Is there talk of equipping a fleet? The poor man says, yes, but the rich citizen and the countryman say, no.’ But this merely means that people tended to vote according to their economic interests.Economou and Kyriazis (2016) also show that rich and poor Athenians had different policy preferences, respectively, pro-peace and pro-war, and expansive programmes of public works offering job opportunities to the poor won majority support. Nevertheless, differences in birth, wealth and policy preferences did not give rise to political parties.…”