2010
DOI: 10.1080/02680930903377415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing for quality or inequality: current perspectives on the implementation of school choice policy in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
106
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These policies have been implemented by several countries to make school admissions fairer and universally effective for all children but none of these initiatives have completely overcome the problems of socioeconomic or racial segregation in the national schools. In fact some have had negative impact on school mix and diversity of children in schools (Bartholo 2013, Bunar 2010, West and Allen 2008. The point here is that even a nationally governed school system cannot lead to a perfect mix of students in schools.…”
Section: School Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These policies have been implemented by several countries to make school admissions fairer and universally effective for all children but none of these initiatives have completely overcome the problems of socioeconomic or racial segregation in the national schools. In fact some have had negative impact on school mix and diversity of children in schools (Bartholo 2013, Bunar 2010, West and Allen 2008. The point here is that even a nationally governed school system cannot lead to a perfect mix of students in schools.…”
Section: School Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the things that is shown most clearly in the article is that despite free school choice there is still a visible segregation and difference between schools depending on where you live and what social, cultural and linguistic background you have (Bunar, 2010). Also shown is that the pupils resist and respond to the possibilities of choice and competitive demands in different ways (Öhrn, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apple, Kenway and Singh, 2005). However, the shift from a uniform, centrally regulated school system to one with far-going decentralization and market elements, based on ideas of choice and competition, has been more rapid and radical in Sweden than in many other places (Bunar, 2010;Lundahl, 2011). The whole Swedish education system is now exposed to competition and choice, but marketization has hitherto been most powerful at upper secondary level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of universalism and equality are tending to be replaced by virtues of 'becoming the best' and 'making a difference'. Swedish schools presently work in a highly decentralized and, in international comparison, uniquely market-oriented context (Bunar, 2010;Lundahl, 2011). At the same time their work is supposed to build on the old values of the social democratic welfare-regime, which creates considerable tensions and professional dilemmas .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%