2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-002-0200-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
670
1
89

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(767 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
670
1
89
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods of estimating groundwater recharge are broadly categorized as waterbudget methods, modeling methods, physical methods involving saturated and unsaturated zones, and tracer techniques involving chemical, isotopic, and heat tracers (Healy 2010). In spite of the variety of the available techniques, precise recharge estimation is difficult because of high levels of uncertainty associated with most estimation methods (Scanlon et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of estimating groundwater recharge are broadly categorized as waterbudget methods, modeling methods, physical methods involving saturated and unsaturated zones, and tracer techniques involving chemical, isotopic, and heat tracers (Healy 2010). In spite of the variety of the available techniques, precise recharge estimation is difficult because of high levels of uncertainty associated with most estimation methods (Scanlon et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to SCANLON et al (2002), the biggest limitation of the water balance method is that the precision of the estimate of recharge depends on the accuracy with which the components of the equation were measured or estimated. It should be noted that in any case involving the quantification of information, the accuracy of the data collected is a desirable and necessary requirement, and the designation made by SCANLON et al (2002) is not a limitation but rather a requirement for a good estimate of the recharge water balance method.…”
Section: Water Balance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recharge is calculated as follows SCANLON et al, 2002;WAHNFREID & HIRATA, 2005): (03) in which R d is the direct recharge (LT -1 ), S y is the aquifer specific yield (dimensionless); h is the groundwater level (L), and t is time (T).…”
Section: Methods Of Free Surface Fluctuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one can improve the accuracy of modeling of such complex phenomena by selecting new variables, assuming their relevance and by exploring their relationships to the predicted values. Similarly, estimation of groundwater recharge and discharge (R/D) rates can be based on multiple existing physically based models (Scanlon et al 2002). However, the measurements of such physically based models are difficult and expensive to collect, and a physically based inverse approach provides an alternative, employing readily available information to decrease the processing time (Lin et al 2008b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%