2012
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2012.689259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing a Travel Agency Franchise by Mean of a Global Composite Indicator: An Application in Spain

Abstract: This paper highlights the complexity of the franchise partner selection process from a franchisee's perspective. The purpose of this article is, firstly, to propose the definition of a system of indicators which include all the relevant information which the potential franchisee should take into consideration when choosing a chain secondly, to obtain a global composite indicator for the construction of a ranking of franchisors. In order to illustrate the procedure, a sample of travel agency franchisors in Spai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicator (I) of distance P 2 incorporates ''n'' social variables (X 1 , X 2 ,…,X n ), which provide information that gives an overall view of the situation of the individuals in a group relative concept to be studied. The DP 2 , which contributes to quantifying some aspect of the concept to be synthesized, has thus been used in a large number of studies (Castro-Bonaño 2002;Escobar 2008;Somarriba and Pena 2009;Montero and Larraz 2010;Blancas-Peral et al 2011;Rodríguez 2012;Rodríguez et al 2012;Lozano et al 2011;Blancas-Peral et al 2012;Zarzosa and Somarriba 2013;Rodríguez 2014;Rodríguez et al 2014a, b;Zarzosa et al 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The indicator (I) of distance P 2 incorporates ''n'' social variables (X 1 , X 2 ,…,X n ), which provide information that gives an overall view of the situation of the individuals in a group relative concept to be studied. The DP 2 , which contributes to quantifying some aspect of the concept to be synthesized, has thus been used in a large number of studies (Castro-Bonaño 2002;Escobar 2008;Somarriba and Pena 2009;Montero and Larraz 2010;Blancas-Peral et al 2011;Rodríguez 2012;Rodríguez et al 2012;Lozano et al 2011;Blancas-Peral et al 2012;Zarzosa and Somarriba 2013;Rodríguez 2014;Rodríguez et al 2014a, b;Zarzosa et al 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Es decir, la literatura analizada previamente ha tratado escasamente el tema de si los franquiciadores pueden ser agrupados en clusters o segmentos, en función de sus preferencias sobre el perfil deseado en los franquiciados. La segmentación de franquiciadores se ha llevado a cabo tradicionalmente utilizando una serie de variables cuantitativas que hacen referencia a los establecimientos que dispone el franquiciador, al número de franquiciados, a costes económicos, a la duración del contrato y a los años franquiciando (Blancas-Peral et al, 2012;Carney y Gedajlovic, 1991;Castrogiovanni et al, 1995;Ketchen et al, 2006;López Fernández et al, 2013;López y Ventura, 2001;Rondán-Cataluña et al, 2007). Sin embargo, ninguna variable hace referencia a las preferencias sobre el perfil del franquiciado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified