Choosing a good research topic for premier journals

Lim, Weng Marc

doi:10.1002/joe.22187

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering the long journey and having substantial published scholarships in the domain, bibliometric analysis was the appropriate method for the domain review (Donthu, Kumar, Mukherjee et al., 2021; Mukherjee et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2023). Researchers have synthesized the scholarships on global entrepreneurship topics in the past, with authors taking different approaches such as discussion over techniques such as the heuristics approach, pattern of literature review, research topic choices, and context‐specific review (Guercini and Milanesi, 2020; Kraus et al., 2022; Lim, 2023; Perényi and Losoncz, 2018). These reviews landscape the field of entrepreneurship before the covid‐19 pandemic; however, the corpus of the global entrepreneurship domain increased during the pandemic.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global entrepreneurship in healthcare: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Mishra

Pandey

2023

Glob Bus Org Exc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Covid‐19 pandemic transformed the global entrepreneurship arena. The healthcare sector also transitioned from the traditional in‐person patient‐physician interaction to the virtual telemedicine healthcare delivery system with global outreach. The entrepreneur alliances in the healthcare sector almost doubled during the pandemic with maximum tie‐ups with international healthcare institutions. The study takes a bibliometric perspective by analyzing articles on global entrepreneurship in healthcare. It provides the most influential authors and institutions, the thematic structure through cluster analysis, co‐word network analysis, and co‐citation analysis related to the literature on global entrepreneurship in the healthcare domain. The findings emphasized the importance of local alliances compared to global alliances in healthcare service delivery, especially during a pandemic. Technology was found to be a great enabler for global entrepreneurship. The study also highlights the emerging research themes for scholars working on global entrepreneurship in the healthcare sector.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global entrepreneurship in healthcare: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Mishra

Pandey

2023

Glob Bus Org Exc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Failure to meet these criteria can lead to rejection, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and articulation of the research's theoretical and practical contributions (Lim, 2023a). However, there is limited information in the literature about the psychological processes created by these different recruitment methods (Pillai et al, 2023).…”

Section: Artificial Intelligence In Personnel Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A research topic should not only provide new knowledge but also be justified in its necessity, importance, relevance, and urgency, particularly if it revisits an area that has been previously explored. Failure to meet these criteria can lead to rejection, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and articulation of the research's theoretical and practical contributions (Lim, 2023a). However, there is limited information in the literature about the psychological processes created by these different recruitment methods (Pillai et al., 2023).…”

Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence in employee recruitment

Balcioğlu,

Artar

2024

Glob Bus Org Exc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary goal of this research is to investigate candidate attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI)‐supported chatbots as an alternative to traditional recruitment interviews, aiming to understand the potential impact of AI‐assisted processes on the employee selection landscape. To systematically evaluate various factors and their relative importance in shaping candidate preferences, this study employed the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a decision‐making tool. The AHP approach facilitated the analysis of findings based on the sum of rankings assigned by evaluators to determine the relative significance of different factors. Additionally, a pairwise comparison questionnaire was utilized to assess the application of AI interview methodology within the research framework. This ensured a comprehensive understanding of its potential advantages and drawbacks. By comparing candidates' interview experiences across four main categories—performance anxiety, environmental compliance, self‐trust, and comfort level—the study results reveal that AI‐assisted interviews offer a more advantageous experience for candidates. This suggests that AI technology can play a significant role in enhancing the recruitment process. The research highlights ease of use and suitability for job interviews as critical factors influencing companies' adoption of AI interview technology. Furthermore, it sheds light on the aspects that organizations need to consider when evaluating and implementing AI‐driven solutions in their recruitment strategies.

show abstract

“…Given the sharp and succinct articulation of the problem statement ( necessity , importance , usefulness/relevance , and urgency ), this article endeavors to offer guidelines for advancing theory and practice through critique and change ( aims ) based on the current author's experience as an academic and administrator ( triangulated source of credibility and rigor ). Through these guidelines (i.e., the “ how ”), which builds upon a past editorial on how to choose a good topic (which, when extrapolated, could be used to choose a good cause for critique and change) (Lim, 2023a), it is hoped that people (e.g., professors, professionals, policymakers) in the future will be able to develop good critiques of the status quo (i.e., the “ what ”) so that they can propose exciting and meaningful changes that would advance or empower the advancement of knowledge (or know‐how), and by extension, improve their prospects of successful pitching (e.g., publishing in premier journals, securing projects) while shaping the future of theory (i.e., academic) and practice (i.e., industry, society) (i.e., the “ so what ”).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%