1993
DOI: 10.1016/1054-139x(93)90093-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesterol screening in the adolescent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64 Regardless of the precise definition, using positive family-history information to trigger lipid testing misses substantial numbers of children with elevated lipid levels, ranging from 17% to 90% overall and 30% to 60% in most studies. 32, 63,64,67,69,71,[74][75][76] The proportion of children and adolescents who qualify for screening on the basis of family history is generally between 25% and 55% depending on the sensitivity of the specific familyhistory question. *…”
Section: Key Question 2d: What Is the Accuracy Of Family History In Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Regardless of the precise definition, using positive family-history information to trigger lipid testing misses substantial numbers of children with elevated lipid levels, ranging from 17% to 90% overall and 30% to 60% in most studies. 32, 63,64,67,69,71,[74][75][76] The proportion of children and adolescents who qualify for screening on the basis of family history is generally between 25% and 55% depending on the sensitivity of the specific familyhistory question. *…”
Section: Key Question 2d: What Is the Accuracy Of Family History In Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,36,39 Clinic-based screening generally had higher participation rates than school-based screening. The impact of family history on participation rates was mixed: one study found higher participation in children with family history of high cholesterol (p<0.001) 24 , one no difference 33 , and one study a lower participation rate (45% of non-participants had positive family history vs. 35% of participants, p<0.05). 30…”
Section: Impact On Clinical Management Participation In Universal Scrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…21,31,33,[36][37][38][39] Two additional studies conducted follow-up testing, but did not report attendance. 29,32 Twenty to 80% children did not complete evaluation of lipid levels (Table 3); the most recent study (2006) reported 55% attendance at follow-up.…”
Section: Attendance For Confirmatory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"Children of parents with a combination of CHD and hyperlipidemia are at increased risk of developing early atherosclerosis and need lipid estimation screening" (p. 289). Gagliano, Emans, and Woods (1993) suggest that adolescents be screened rather than children to avoid testing during the years of significant cholesterol level fluctuations and to do so when a change in diet would have less impact on the growing child. There are multiple reasons for the controversy regarding who should be screened and when.…”
Section: Guidelines For Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%