2010
DOI: 10.1134/s002689331002010x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesterol-modified anti-MDR1 small interfering RNA: Uptake and biological activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure to siRNAs caused a concentration-dependent reduction of the P-glycoprotein level. The concentration-dependent results are consistent with our previous observations using anti-MDR1 siR-NAs, which can effectively inhibit target gene expression at a concentration of 200 nM [24]. To compare the biological activity of siRNAs with different lengths we used concentrations of the equal ''dose'' of the 21 nucleotide sequence of siMDR-M repeated two or three times (dose-equivalent concentrations), presuming the processing of siMDR-D and siMDR-T into two or three molecules of siMDR-M, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Exposure to siRNAs caused a concentration-dependent reduction of the P-glycoprotein level. The concentration-dependent results are consistent with our previous observations using anti-MDR1 siR-NAs, which can effectively inhibit target gene expression at a concentration of 200 nM [24]. To compare the biological activity of siRNAs with different lengths we used concentrations of the equal ''dose'' of the 21 nucleotide sequence of siMDR-M repeated two or three times (dose-equivalent concentrations), presuming the processing of siMDR-D and siMDR-T into two or three molecules of siMDR-M, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The pronounced reduction of the number of living cells was observed at Day 6 of cells incubation with cholesterol-containing siMDR ( Figure 6 ). This effect was similar to the effect observed at Day 4 after cell transfection with siMDR/Lipophectamine 2000 ( 54 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These modifications improved the bio-distribution of siRNAs ( 26 , 37 ) and significantly increased their cellular uptake ( 25 , 27 , 35 ). The presence of the cholesterol in siRNA did not however guarantee efficient cellular uptake and gene silencing without the aid of the transfection agent ( 54 ). Moreover, the data on the efficiency of carrier-free uptake and the biological effects of lipophilic siRNAs vary significantly in different reports where different synthetic methods for the introduction of lipophilic moieties resulted in the obtaining of the conjugates with different structures ( 26 , 37 , 54 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjugates of anti-mdr1 siRNA sense strand [36,37] with trileucine ( 19 ) and cholesteryl-6-aminohexylcarbamate ( 20 ) were also successfully synthesized in optimal conditions (Table 1, Scheme 3A). Moreover, the proposed approach allows, when necessary, to lengthen the spacer between the oligonucleotide and the ligand by several successive activation/addition solid-phase reactions through DSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%