2015
DOI: 10.1017/s000711451500183x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesterol and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies investigating the associations between total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the risk of breast cancer. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed (up to January 2014). Inclusion criteria were original peer-reviewed publications with a prospective design. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI. Distinc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
116
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we asked about age at diagnosis as well as treatment for these metabolic conditions, our questions on treatment were not detailed precluding analysis by type of treatment ( e.g ., specific medications). Thus, our results may not be directly comparable to previous studies, which have included a range of definitions for single conditions including hypertension (HBP values or self‐reported hypertension diagnosed by a physician), reported diabetes or fasting glucose values, reported history of high cholesterol or reported blood values of triglyceride, HDL‐C and total cholesterol as well as combination of these factors . In our question on high cholesterol, we did not ask specifically about cholesterol fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Although we asked about age at diagnosis as well as treatment for these metabolic conditions, our questions on treatment were not detailed precluding analysis by type of treatment ( e.g ., specific medications). Thus, our results may not be directly comparable to previous studies, which have included a range of definitions for single conditions including hypertension (HBP values or self‐reported hypertension diagnosed by a physician), reported diabetes or fasting glucose values, reported history of high cholesterol or reported blood values of triglyceride, HDL‐C and total cholesterol as well as combination of these factors . In our question on high cholesterol, we did not ask specifically about cholesterol fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Our results for all breast cancers combined do not show these small increases in risk, but the increases in risk we found for later stage disease are consistent with other analyses by stage (1517). Two meta-analyses reported little association between increasing levels of total cholesterol (18, 19) and breast cancer risk, but reported an inverse association when preclinical bias was eliminated (18) or for HDL-C in postmenopausal women (19). Our results for dyslipidemia and regional and distant breast cancer, but not localized breast cancer, are consistent with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 HDL particles are an important carrier of circulating plasma cholesterol and promote mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and AKT signaling pathways through binding of HDL to the SR-BI receptor. 47 Data extracted from studies based on the function of HDL and SR-BI receptor in two human cell lines of breast cancer, MDA-MB-231 and MCF7, and growth of tumors have shown the ability of HDL to promote migration and induce various signaling pathways.…”
Section: Metabolism Of Cholesterol In Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%