1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(20)31539-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesteatoma of the Middle Ear and Mastoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mafee et al 10 and David et al 11 described the criteria indicating cholesteatoma as “blunting of the scutum's normally sharp tip is often the earliest sign of attic cholesteatoma.” 10,11…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mafee et al 10 and David et al 11 described the criteria indicating cholesteatoma as “blunting of the scutum's normally sharp tip is often the earliest sign of attic cholesteatoma.” 10,11…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with Hasso et al and Mafee et al, who mentioned that HRCT could demonstrate cholesteatoma in hidden areas such as post tympanic recesses, which could not be detected by the otologic examination. 10,13…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,5 Although cholesteatoma is said to show a lower attenuation than granulation tissue the difference is subtle and only magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate the two. 6 After clinical examination, otoscopy, and a diagnosis of cholesteatoma, CT can determine its extent by revealing the combination of a soft tissue mass and bone erosion, with 80 per cent speci city. 4,7 Clinical irrelevance in predicting problems Indeed, challenging anatomy limiting access will become obvious as drilling proceeds but foreknowledge may in uence the choice of approach.…”
Section: Radiation Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On HRCT, cholesteatoma appears as a soft-tissue "mass-like" density in the middle ear cavity and mastoid antrum with associated signs of mass effect in the form of surrounding smooth bony erosions and expansion cavities [ 4 ]. The likelihood of cholesteatoma increases when the soft tissue opacity is non-dependent [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%