2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00298-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesteatoma in children: techniques and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Open cavity mastoidectomy has the advantages of allowing the surgeon to examine the operative field and to remove all the cholesteatomas in the mastoid and middle ear as well as in the epitympanum. Consequently, the postoperative recurrence rate of cholesteatoma with this approach is far lower than with ICW mastoidectomy (11-14). On the other hand, atticoantrotomy also has shown a lower rate of recurrence than ICW mastoidectomy (15) Abramson et al have reported that the recurrence of cholesteatoma was occurred after atticotomy in 17% and ICW in 35%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Open cavity mastoidectomy has the advantages of allowing the surgeon to examine the operative field and to remove all the cholesteatomas in the mastoid and middle ear as well as in the epitympanum. Consequently, the postoperative recurrence rate of cholesteatoma with this approach is far lower than with ICW mastoidectomy (11-14). On the other hand, atticoantrotomy also has shown a lower rate of recurrence than ICW mastoidectomy (15) Abramson et al have reported that the recurrence of cholesteatoma was occurred after atticotomy in 17% and ICW in 35%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the rate of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma is generally lower in an open technique. In recent publications, rates of residual cholesteatoma in children have ranged from 22% to 54% after ICW procedures and from 7.5% to 29% after canal wall down (CWD) procedures, while rates of recurrent cholesteatoma have ranged from 3% to 40% in ICW and from 6% to 29% in CWD [9][10][11] procedures. In our series we found a recurrence rate of cholesteatoma, by using a canal wall down approach, in 26.6% of children and in 6.81% of adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is also considered to provide good access to the posterior epitympanic space and oval window niche area [9,10] . Thus, the possibility of residual cholesteatoma decrease substantially, and the need for a second look procedure becomes minimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%