2009
DOI: 10.1002/wics.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesky factorization

Abstract: This article aimed at a general audience of computational scientists, surveys the Cholesky factorization for symmetric positive definite matrices, covering algorithms for computing it, the numerical stability of the algorithms, and updating and downdating of the factorization. Cholesky factorization with pivoting for semidefinite matrices is also treated. 

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the problems described in [3], whereas the aggregation and disaggregation matrices were dependent only on a group of sources, and thus only on few h i , here, they are still dependent on all independent RVs ξ. Besides the aforementioned curse of dimensionality in calculating PCE projections (7), this also entails an unacceptably long solution time of (8). Indeed, since the aggregation and the disaggregation matrices are dependent on all independent RVs, their PCE coefficients are all nonzero and the complexity does not scale linearly with the number of polynomials K as in [3], but with the total number of γ klm .…”
Section: Cholesky-based Sgm-mlfmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to the problems described in [3], whereas the aggregation and disaggregation matrices were dependent only on a group of sources, and thus only on few h i , here, they are still dependent on all independent RVs ξ. Besides the aforementioned curse of dimensionality in calculating PCE projections (7), this also entails an unacceptably long solution time of (8). Indeed, since the aggregation and the disaggregation matrices are dependent on all independent RVs, their PCE coefficients are all nonzero and the complexity does not scale linearly with the number of polynomials K as in [3], but with the total number of γ klm .…”
Section: Cholesky-based Sgm-mlfmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cholesky factorization of a n×n matrix has a complexity in term of floating point operation of n 3 /3 that is half of the LU one (2n 3 /3), and is numerically more stable [9], [10]. This algorithm is naturally in-place as every input element is accessed only once and before writing the associated element of the output: L and A can be the same storage.…”
Section: A Cholesky Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superscript T indicates matrix transposition. Observe that (4) and (5) use a variant of the Cholesky factorization, defined in [7] as:…”
Section: Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%