2010
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.113480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholecalciferol Supplementation throughout Winter Does Not Affect Markers of Bone Turnover in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults

Abstract: Although there have been several studies of the effect of vitamin D status on bone turnover in the elderly, the findings are unclear, and, furthermore, to date very few have investigated this in young adults. The objective of these randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-center intervention studies was to investigate the effect of cholecalciferol supplementation (0, 5, 10, and 15 microg cholecalciferol/d) throughout winter time on indices of vitamin D status and bone turnover in young (aged 20-40 y; n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
18
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hurst et al [26] found that women who were deficient in vitamin D and who were administered 4000 IU of cholecalciferol daily for 6 months exhibited a suppression of age-induced bone turnover and bone resorption. However, our results did not indicate that cholecalciferol supplementation had any effect on the levels of bone turnover markers, which is consistent with data from previous studies [21,27] . These results might have occurred because the participants in our study received inadequate doses of vitamin D supplementation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Hurst et al [26] found that women who were deficient in vitamin D and who were administered 4000 IU of cholecalciferol daily for 6 months exhibited a suppression of age-induced bone turnover and bone resorption. However, our results did not indicate that cholecalciferol supplementation had any effect on the levels of bone turnover markers, which is consistent with data from previous studies [21,27] . These results might have occurred because the participants in our study received inadequate doses of vitamin D supplementation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, based on the multivariate analysis, this dose-effect response was mainly explained by the baseline serum 25(OH)D and not the higher supplementation dose itself. In several studies, it has been reported that a higher vitamin D supplementation dose resulted in higher serum 25(OH)D levels (16,17,18,19). However, in contrast to our study, the effect of different supplementation doses was investigated in subjects with 25(OH)D levels O50 nmol/l and in groups with equal baseline 25(OH)D levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Kuwabara et al [21] discovered that the supplementation of 200 mg of calcium with 800 IU of vitamin D 3 daily for one month significantly lowered the serum PTH levels compared with the supplementation of only 200 mg of calcium daily. Seemans et al [17] identified that in the winter, the endpoint serum PTH level to be significantly lower in 3 cholecalciferol-supplemented groups (cholecalciferol 200 IU, 400 IU, and 600 IU) compared with the placebo group, though other bone turnover markers were not affected. An increased rate of bone turnover is associated with low bone mass [22] and an increased risk of bone fracture [23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hurst et al [16] has shown that vitamin D-deficient women who were administered 4000 IU of cholecalciferol daily for 6 months displayed a suppression of age-induced bone turnover and bone resorption. However, some studies have shown cholecalciferol supplementation have no effect on bone turnover markers [17,21] . Oral vitamin D supplementation increases bone mineral density and appears to reduce the risk of hip and other nonvertebral fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation