2015
DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.202010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholecalciferol Supplementation Does Not Influence β-Cell Function and Insulin Action in Obese Adolescents: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial,

Abstract: The current study shows no effect from vitamin D3 supplementation, irrespective of its dose, on β-cell function or insulin action in obese nondiabetic adolescents with relatively good vitamin D status. Whether obese adolescents with vitamin D deficiency and impaired glucose metabolism would respond differently to vitamin D3 supplementation remains unclear and warrants further studies. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00858247.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that the majority of trials failed to demonstrate a consistent and clinically meaningful benefit of vitamin D treatment on glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus, [41][42][43][44][45][46] glucose intolerance 22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]47 or in other cohorts. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] In recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews, this led to the notion that there is currently no evidence to support a routine correction of vitamin D insufficiency in patients with diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance. 7,8,18,19,56,57 Nevertheless, the heterogeneity between the different trials, especially with regard to dose, treatment duration and ethnicity, leaves the possibility that there are certain subgroups of patients who might benefit from vitamin D supplementation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that the majority of trials failed to demonstrate a consistent and clinically meaningful benefit of vitamin D treatment on glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus, [41][42][43][44][45][46] glucose intolerance 22,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31]47 or in other cohorts. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] In recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews, this led to the notion that there is currently no evidence to support a routine correction of vitamin D insufficiency in patients with diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance. 7,8,18,19,56,57 Nevertheless, the heterogeneity between the different trials, especially with regard to dose, treatment duration and ethnicity, leaves the possibility that there are certain subgroups of patients who might benefit from vitamin D supplementation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in an older white population with impaired fasting glucose, 700 IU of vitamin D for 3 years attenuated the change in fasting glucose and HOMA‐IR . Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that the majority of trials failed to demonstrate a consistent and clinically meaningful benefit of vitamin D treatment on glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus, glucose intolerance or in other cohorts . In recent meta‐analyses and systematic reviews, this led to the notion that there is currently no evidence to support a routine correction of vitamin D insufficiency in patients with diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Javed and al. [4] showed no effect of VD supplementation (2000 IU maximal dose) on insulin activity in non-diabetic adolescents with obesity without VD insufficiency. On the other hand, Belenchia and al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While higher VitD status is associated with better β-cell function among those with T2D [60•, 61], it is not a predictor of diabetes incidence, and adequate VitD levels do not protect against the development of T2D [62]. VitD supplementation in individuals already sufficient in VitD seems to have no effect on insulin secretion [63]. It appears that due to its involvement in insulin secretion, VitD as a treatment is only effective at increasing insulin secretion in populations with VitD deficiencies or other syndromes, such as parathyroid hormone deficiency and T2D [64•, 65, 66].…”
Section: Vitamin Dmentioning
confidence: 98%