Choice, Preference, and Disability 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35683-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choices, Preferences, and Disability: A View from Central and Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, guardianship systems in the United States have not been subject to the same human rights reform agenda as those in Australia (Duffy, 2023). Also, Eastern and Central European countries, despite endeavours at legal capacity reform, have moved more slowly to de‐institutionalisation, continuing to lack community living options and accompanying services (Tichá et al., 2020). All of these countries still have systems of guardianship where courts make declarations of incapacity and appoint substitute decision makers for adults with cognitive disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, guardianship systems in the United States have not been subject to the same human rights reform agenda as those in Australia (Duffy, 2023). Also, Eastern and Central European countries, despite endeavours at legal capacity reform, have moved more slowly to de‐institutionalisation, continuing to lack community living options and accompanying services (Tichá et al., 2020). All of these countries still have systems of guardianship where courts make declarations of incapacity and appoint substitute decision makers for adults with cognitive disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%