Choices in Cataloging Electronic Journals

Leathem, Cecilia

doi:10.1300/j101v17n33_07

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…She noted that her library at the University of Miami changed from the single to the separate record approach despite being aware of serious drawbacks to the user and finds that "the separate record option appears to allow the library to take advantage of services and products that are currently available and to have the flexibility to accommodate future commercial developments." 11 Banush's article title, "Rehabilitating Killer Serial," underscored that electronic journals retained the wilderness aspect previously ascribed to them. Along with other libraries, Cornell wrestled with the single vs. multiple record choice and other quandaries related to electronic journals and found its electronic journal management in need of a makeover.…”

Section: Single or Separate Record Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic Journals: Cataloging and Management Practices in Academic Libraries

West¹,

Miller²

2011

Serials Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Single or Separate Record Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic Journals: Cataloging and Management Practices in Academic Libraries

West¹,

Miller²

2011

Serials Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Cataloging treatment options for online serials, single or separate records, were outlined by Leathem. 71 The single record option allowed online access to be added to the print record and was a quick way to add e-journals to the catalog. Prior to July 2003, using the separate record cataloging option meant creating records for each online manifestation of a serial.…”

Section: Lrts 51(4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Building Connections

Genereux¹

2007

Library Resources &Amp; Technical Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

51(4) LRTSA s in past years, electronic journals pervaded all aspects of the serials literature in 2004 and 2005. Electronic journals were changing pricing models as well as management of and access to serials. Support and satisfaction with large, bundled collections of online journals diminished as librarians questioned their benefits and affect on collections. Librarians began looking at other pricing models, such as tiered pricing and open access. Managing and providing access to serials became more complicated, especially as the number of e-journals available to libraries grew. Typical print workflows did not work with online serials. Additional information, such as tracking subscriptions, licenses, URL changes, and title level coverage information, needs to be monitored. In response to those challenges, new serials management services and tools were developed and implemented by libraries. Some of those services assist in tracking coverage information, generating A to Z title lists, and providing MARC records. These services are changing the way serials are cataloged. Loading records has led to libraries changing their cataloging policies and is changing the responsibilities of serials catalogers.Although e-serials touch all aspects of serials literature, another topic frequently mentioned directly and indirectly is the relationship between libraries, publishers, and vendors.

show abstract

Clear As Glass: A Combined List Of Print And Electronic Journals In The Knowledge Base

Lowe

2008

Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choices in Cataloging Electronic Journals

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Electronic Journals: Cataloging and Management Practices in Academic Libraries

Electronic Journals: Cataloging and Management Practices in Academic Libraries

Building Connections

Clear As Glass: A Combined List Of Print And Electronic Journals In The Knowledge Base

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About