2001
DOI: 10.1080/03098770020030524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choices and Barriers: Factors influencing women's choice of higher education in science, engineering and technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively small proportion of female respondents is consistent with the numbers of women studying ICT at the universities involved (Department of Education Employment and Work Relations, 2011), and with the literature on the notably low female participation in ICT education at a tertiary level in Western countries (Cory et al, 2006;Craig et al, 2007; S. Lewis et al, 2007;Ogan et al, 2006;Siann & Callaghan, 2001). The majority of the participants had studied full time (74%) and were domestic students (92.7%).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The relatively small proportion of female respondents is consistent with the numbers of women studying ICT at the universities involved (Department of Education Employment and Work Relations, 2011), and with the literature on the notably low female participation in ICT education at a tertiary level in Western countries (Cory et al, 2006;Craig et al, 2007; S. Lewis et al, 2007;Ogan et al, 2006;Siann & Callaghan, 2001). The majority of the participants had studied full time (74%) and were domestic students (92.7%).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Society has labelled computing as male (Wajcman, 2000) and this has extended to these environments being unattractive to women, whether within organisations or education, creating a culture of individualism that expects long hours of work and values Computer Science Education 321 competition yet devalues female skills of communication (Pearl et al, 2002;Roldan et al, 2004, p. 110). Siann and Callaghan (2001) suggested that the perception of computing as a masculine domain may account for young women making positive choices to avoid the discipline, as opposed to being prevented from embracing it due to barriers. It is hypothesised that females have low expectancy beliefs in computing, and do not weight it as being important to them, so avoid it.…”
Section: Women Computing and Course Choicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Women are particularly interested in subjects that lead to careers which society does not value monetarily as highly as others: consequently they tend to have lower-paid careers than do men (Siann & Callaghan, 2001;van de Werfhorst et al, 2003), although they also choose medicine and law (high-paid careers) because of human interest rather than high income (Lightbody et al, 1997). A classic chicken-and-egg (rhetorical) question arises here: is it because women dominate certain careers that society fails to value them highly in monetary terms?…”
Section: Perceptions Of He Relevance To Career Income and Employabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%