2019
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2019.1565518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice Structuring Properties of Natural Resource Theft: An Examination of Redwood Burl Poaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its first application was manifested in the Lemieux and Clarke 2009 study of elephant poaching in Africa [ 25 ]. Subsequently, researchers have applied these theories to the study of parrot poaching in Latin America [ 26 , 27 ] and Indonesia [ 28 ]; illegal commercial fishing [ 29 , 30 ]; illegal recreational fishing [ 31 , 32 ]; tiger poaching [ 33 ]; human–leopard conflict [ 34 ]; redwood burl poaching [ 35 ]; and others. The collective findings of these studies have demonstrated the utility of examining such crimes through the environmental criminological theoretical lens, because evidence-based intervention strategies can then be directly derived from within these theoretical foundations to effectively deal with such problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its first application was manifested in the Lemieux and Clarke 2009 study of elephant poaching in Africa [ 25 ]. Subsequently, researchers have applied these theories to the study of parrot poaching in Latin America [ 26 , 27 ] and Indonesia [ 28 ]; illegal commercial fishing [ 29 , 30 ]; illegal recreational fishing [ 31 , 32 ]; tiger poaching [ 33 ]; human–leopard conflict [ 34 ]; redwood burl poaching [ 35 ]; and others. The collective findings of these studies have demonstrated the utility of examining such crimes through the environmental criminological theoretical lens, because evidence-based intervention strategies can then be directly derived from within these theoretical foundations to effectively deal with such problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurland and colleagues (2018) determined that target abundance (density), availability of roads, and proximity to illegal markets all impacted the likelihood of specific redwood areas to be targeted for burl poaching. This was further expanded in a subsequent exploration of choice structuring properties by Marteache and Pires (2020), which found that factors that likely contribute to burl selection include risk of detection, proximity to burl shop, familiarity with the area, proximity to roads to allow for easy access to possible targets, the height of the burl relative to the ground (to allow for easy removal from the tree), and slope of the target relative to their vehicle (higher or similar slope to the road). While there is overlap between characteristics that drive fauna poaching (such as target density), this line of research suggests that there may be different factors that impact flora poaching.…”
Section: Environmental Crime In Protected Areas: Situational Risk Facmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the introductory story, Andy's objective was to set snares and remain undetected, while Romeo One aimed to detect any suspicious activity, but ultimately to prevent poaching altogether. Recent studies within environmental criminology have applied RCP to understand the decision-making of poachers (Marteache and Pires 2019;Pires and Clarke 2012). This dissertation adds to the growing body of literature using RCP to explain poaching problems.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%