2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
271
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
29
271
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As S− cues are not rewarded, the signal obtained for those responses cannot be driven by the reward itself, making a reward expectation account a plausible alternative. Our findings are consistent with several human neuroimaging studies showing an activation of the NAc during the anticipatory phase of a monetary incentive delay task (Ernst et al, 2004;Kirsch et al, 2003;Knutson et al, 2000). A straightforward acceptance of the reward anticipation account is somewhat challenged by the lack of significant increase in NAc O 2 signal following incorrect lever choice to the S+.…”
Section: Nucleus Accumbens Activation and Reward Anticipationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As S− cues are not rewarded, the signal obtained for those responses cannot be driven by the reward itself, making a reward expectation account a plausible alternative. Our findings are consistent with several human neuroimaging studies showing an activation of the NAc during the anticipatory phase of a monetary incentive delay task (Ernst et al, 2004;Kirsch et al, 2003;Knutson et al, 2000). A straightforward acceptance of the reward anticipation account is somewhat challenged by the lack of significant increase in NAc O 2 signal following incorrect lever choice to the S+.…”
Section: Nucleus Accumbens Activation and Reward Anticipationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, McClure et al (2004) have shown that decisions reflecting a preference for smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards are associated with relatively increased activation of the ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex, all regions linked to the socio-emotional network, whereas regions implicated in cognitive control (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal areas) are engaged equivalently across decision conditions. Similarly, two recent studies (Matthews et al, 2004;Ernst et al, 2004) show that increased activity in regions of the socio-emotional network (ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex) predicts the selection of comparatively risky (but potentially highly rewarding) choices over more conservative choices. Finally, one recent experimental study found that transient disruption of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortical function via transcranial magnetic stimulation (i.e., disruption of a region known to be crucial to cognitive control) increased risktaking in a gambling task (Knoch, Gianotti, Pascual-Leone, Treyer, Regard, Hohmann, et al, 2006).…”
Section: Functional Changes In the Cognitive Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This competitive interaction has been implicated in a wide range of decision making-contexts, including drug use (Bechara, 2005;Chambers, 2003), social decision processing (Sanfey et al, 2003), moral judgments (Greene et al, 2004), and the valuation of alternative rewards and costs Ernst et al, 2004), as well as in an account of adolescent risktaking (Chambers, 2003). In each instance, impulsive or risky choices are presumed to arise when the socio-emotional network dominates the cognitive control network.…”
Section: Functional Changes In the Cognitive Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stimuli include food and sexual behavior (given that sustenance and procreation are crucial for the survival of a species [95,96]), and social interactions with conspecifics [39,97]. Nonclinical human neuroimaging studies indicate that the mesolimbic DA response to primary rewards may operate similarly in humans in response to more abstract, or secondary, rewards such as monetary incentives [98-100]. Recent evidence suggests a common ‘neural currency’ for coding monetary and primary (for example, food) rewards [101].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%