1993
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v82.7.2235.2235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of pretransplant treatment and timing of transplants for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase [see comments]

Abstract: We analyzed the outcome of 450 HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase performed between 1985 and 1990 and reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR). All patients received either hydroxyurea (n = 292) or busulfan (n = 158) to treat their CML before transplant. The median interval between diagnosis and transplant was 10 months (range, 1 to 191). Patients treated with hydroxyurea had a higher probability (95% confidence int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 However, among other factors, outcome determined as capacity for unsupported hematopoietic reconstitution at day 30 following BMT is significantly influenced by progression of disease at onset and thus timing. [3][4][5] Regarding staging of chronic phase CML indicating a certain progress [4][5][6] or definition of acceler-ated or blastic phases, 7 some data have been accumulated that histopathology may offer supportive evidence. Follow-up studies on bone marrow histopathology together with clinical observations were in keeping with the finding that reduction in erythropoiesis 8 and extent of myelofibrosis [9][10][11][12] may serve as valid parameters for the assessment of disease progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, among other factors, outcome determined as capacity for unsupported hematopoietic reconstitution at day 30 following BMT is significantly influenced by progression of disease at onset and thus timing. [3][4][5] Regarding staging of chronic phase CML indicating a certain progress [4][5][6] or definition of acceler-ated or blastic phases, 7 some data have been accumulated that histopathology may offer supportive evidence. Follow-up studies on bone marrow histopathology together with clinical observations were in keeping with the finding that reduction in erythropoiesis 8 and extent of myelofibrosis [9][10][11][12] may serve as valid parameters for the assessment of disease progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allogeneic SCT is reported to produce long‐term, disease‐free survival in approximately 40–80% of patients treated in chronic phase (depending on patient age, donor source and degree of matching, and other factors). However, it is linked to an inherent risk of mortality (10–40%), as well as significant morbidities 4–6. IFN‐α therapy induces complete suppression of Ph‐positive cells (i.e., complete cytogenetic response) in 5–30% of patients and prolongs median survival to approximately 7 years 7–12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)‐positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has centered around strategies that suppress the Ph‐positive cells or the Ph‐associated BCR‐ABL molecular abnormalities 1, 2. Therapeutic modalities now include allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT), regimens containing interferon‐alpha (IFN‐α), and, more recently, the Bcr‐Abl selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate (imatinib, Gleevec, STI571 [Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ]) 3–17. The early results with imatinib are extremely encouraging 18, 19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%