1981
DOI: 10.1016/0094-1190(81)90021-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
174
0
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
174
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the functional form of hedonic models is an empirical one as there is no compelling theoretical foundation for any particular form (Malpezzi, 2002;Halvorsen and Pollakowski 1981). The Panels in Table 2 shows how the coefficient on distance to the nearest heritage sites changes as the functional form changes for different categories.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Cultural Heritage Coefficients To Different Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the functional form of hedonic models is an empirical one as there is no compelling theoretical foundation for any particular form (Malpezzi, 2002;Halvorsen and Pollakowski 1981). The Panels in Table 2 shows how the coefficient on distance to the nearest heritage sites changes as the functional form changes for different categories.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Cultural Heritage Coefficients To Different Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the overall prices of hotel rooms, including particular combinations of attributes, are observed. Our analysis draws upon the hedonic-prices tradition of fitting statistical models to estimate the effect of attributes on price (early theoretical developments in hedonic prices are those of Rosen, 1974;Halvorsen and Pollakowski, 1981;and Cassel and Mendelsohn, 1985. Empirical applications in the tourist sector are found in Sinclair, Clewer and Pack, 1990;Clewer, Pack and Sinclair, 1992;and Jaime-Pastor, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum values of the likelihood function of the restricted and unrestricted models are used to test the significance of the parameter transformation in the unrestricted model. The test statistic employed to determine the confidence interval for λ: (4) where λ is the restricted lambda, λ* is the unrestricted lambda, L max is the value of the likelihood function that is related to each model, and α is the level of significance (Halvorsen and Pollakowski 1981). This test statistic (4) may be used to test the H 0 , which asserts that the correct functional form is double-log (λ = 0) or linear (λ = 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%