2010
DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2010.522163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice experiment assessment of public expenditure preferences

Abstract: Preferences for changes to public expenditures were evaluated using a choice experiment. Results indicate potential efficiency gains from reallocation of expenditures to items with higher marginal welfare. In particular, respondents were found to prefer more spending on health, education and the environment, with health spending providing the highest marginal benefits. The public preferred less expenditure on income support. The choice experiment also identified the impacts of demographic factors. The approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be implemented with pairs of programmes or a limited number of programs. In addition, choice experiments between programmes have been implemented in the budget allocation context (Kerr et al 2010, Skedgel et al 2013, Ozdemir et al 2016.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be implemented with pairs of programmes or a limited number of programs. In addition, choice experiments between programmes have been implemented in the budget allocation context (Kerr et al 2010, Skedgel et al 2013, Ozdemir et al 2016.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elicitation of the preferred budget allocation with various methods has particularly been applied in health care sector decisions (Costa-Font and Rovira 2005, Skedgel et al 2013, Costa-Font et al 2015, but also in decisions between main budget classes (Blomquist et al 2004, Koford 2009, Kerr et al 2010 or specific programmes in several sectors (Ozdemir et al 2016). In environmental or natural resource decisions, budget allocation experiments have been rare.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third group of variables is dedicated to socioeconomic characteristics, namely age, gender, social class, education level, religion, living with a partner and living with children. These variables are usually considered by welfare economics to influence individuals' utility (approximated here with the allocation) for a given item (here a given government function) (Kerr et al , 2010).…”
Section: Modeling Respondent Allocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%