2015
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloroquine inhibited Ebola virus replication in vitro but failed to protect against infection and disease in the in vivo guinea pig model

Abstract: Ebola virus (EBOV) is highly pathogenic, with a predisposition to cause outbreaks in human populations accompanied by significant mortality. Owing to the lack of approved therapies, screening programmes of potentially efficacious drugs have been undertaken. One of these studies has demonstrated the possible utility of chloroquine against EBOV using pseudotyped assays. In mouse models of EBOV disease there are conflicting reports of the therapeutic effects of chloroquine. There are currently no reports of its e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in efficacy of iminosugars in EBOV-infected mouse and guinea pig models may be due to differences between species, EBOV-strains used or the potency of the different iminosugars, and cannot be determined without performing direct comparisons. Discrepancies in efficacy testing chloroquine against EBOV have been reported previously with efficacy observed in mice [55] but not when tested in guinea pigs [56] or hamsters [57]. The different effects on the pseudotyped virus could similarly be explained by use of GP from different EBOV-isolates and it is worth noting that, in Chang et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difference in efficacy of iminosugars in EBOV-infected mouse and guinea pig models may be due to differences between species, EBOV-strains used or the potency of the different iminosugars, and cannot be determined without performing direct comparisons. Discrepancies in efficacy testing chloroquine against EBOV have been reported previously with efficacy observed in mice [55] but not when tested in guinea pigs [56] or hamsters [57]. The different effects on the pseudotyped virus could similarly be explained by use of GP from different EBOV-isolates and it is worth noting that, in Chang et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This resulted in 11 drug screening,23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 17 preclinical studies,34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 and 9 clinical studies 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If unavailable, we reported the half maximal inhibitory concentration or EC 50 values from the World Health Organization categorization and prioritization table 60 . A total of 14 studies included experiments on animals 26, 27, 29, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50. Three of these trials were carried out on monkey species,39, 44, 50 such as the rhesus macaques, whilst the remaining 11 studies where carried on small animal models, such as mice, hamsters, or guinea pigs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2), a very well-known remedy in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for the treatment of a number of diseases such as tuberculosis, dysentery, malaria, cancer, and fever, 19 isolated from different species of plants from the Menispermaceae family, was shown to inhibit EBOV entry into host cells and infection of human macrophages (EC 50 ¼ 55 nM) by binding to TPC. [22][23][24] 20 Madrid et al showed that the antimalarial chloroquine (CQ) (Fig.…”
Section: Endocytosis And/or Macropinocytosis Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%