2002
DOI: 10.1038/nature01213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloroplast avoidance movement reduces photodamage in plants

Abstract: When plants are exposed to light levels higher than those required for photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species are generated in the chloroplasts and cause photodamage. This can occur even under natural growth conditions. To mitigate photodamage, plants have developed several protective mechanisms. One is chloroplast avoidance movement, in which chloroplasts move from the cell surface to the side walls of cells under high light conditions, although experimental support is still awaited. Here, using different cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
394
3
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
394
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Accumulation along the periclinal cell walls under low-light conditions is believed to maximize light capture for photosynthesis, whereas the avoidance response to high light protects chloroplasts from photodamage by positioning chloroplasts in areas where light intensities are lowest (Zurzycki, 1961;Lechowski, 1974;Gorton and Vogelmann, 1996;Park et al, 1996;Trojan and Gabrys, 1996). Indeed, upon transfer to high light, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants that lack light-induced chloroplast movements displayed signs of photodamage more rapidly than wild type (Kasahara et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulation along the periclinal cell walls under low-light conditions is believed to maximize light capture for photosynthesis, whereas the avoidance response to high light protects chloroplasts from photodamage by positioning chloroplasts in areas where light intensities are lowest (Zurzycki, 1961;Lechowski, 1974;Gorton and Vogelmann, 1996;Park et al, 1996;Trojan and Gabrys, 1996). Indeed, upon transfer to high light, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants that lack light-induced chloroplast movements displayed signs of photodamage more rapidly than wild type (Kasahara et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under weak light conditions, chloroplasts move toward light to capture light efficiently (the accumulation response; Zurzycki, 1955). Under strong light conditions, chloroplasts escape from light to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response; Kasahara et al, 2002;Sztatelman et al, 2010;Davis and Hangarter, 2012;Cazzaniga et al, 2013). In most green plant species, these responses are induced primarily by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot) in response to a range of wavelengths from UVA to blue light (approximately 320-500 nm; for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2013;Kong and Wada, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron and proton transfer processes can be highly efficient, but when energy capture outpaces the capacity of photosynthesis, a situation that can occur at high light and/or under adverse environmental conditions, reactive intermediates can accumulate in the photosynthetic apparatus, leading to generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), mainly O 2 -• in PSI and mainly 1O2 in PSII, and these are responsible for oxidative photodamage. A range of photoprotective mechanisms have evolved to ameliorate photodamage and its effects, including nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) processes such as the q E response (11), a complex cycle to repair damaged photosystem II (PSII) (12), chloroplast movements (13), cyclic electron flow (14,15), redox tuning to redirect back-reactions to non-ROS producing pathways (16,17) and alternative electron acceptor systems (18,19). Despite the diversity and complexity of these processes, in general they result in the loss of light energy, for example the decreased efficiency of light capture incurred by activation of NPQ (20), charge recombination (16), or the dissipation of redox energy when electrons are passed to the flavodiiron O 2 reductases (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%