1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb14641.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorophyll Stability During Continuous Aseptic Processing and Storage

Abstract: Spinach puree was aseptically processed and packaged at four timetemperature treatments (19.2 and 5.3 set @ 142°C; 19.2 and 12.2 set @ 137°C). Samples processed at 142°C for 5.3 set retained 68% of total chlorophyll compared to blanched samples while all chlorophylls were degraded in retorted product. The rate of chlorophyll b degradation and pheophytin b formation during storage in flexible containers at 4, 25, and 40°C fit a first order kinetic model. Apparent activation energies during storage for each time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
71
1
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
71
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, higher retention of chlorophylls a (73.8 %) and b (66.4 %) was recorded for cabinet tray drying, which explains the quality of (dark green colour) of the dehydrated powder and favour better consumer acceptance. Chlorophyll a was reported to be thermally less or equally stable than chlorophyll b (King et al 2001), which is largely due to a function of water activity in the material (Schwartz and Lorenzo 1991). Interestingly, higher retention of chlorophyll a than chlorophyll b was observed for all the drying methods and this has not been pointed out previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In our study, higher retention of chlorophylls a (73.8 %) and b (66.4 %) was recorded for cabinet tray drying, which explains the quality of (dark green colour) of the dehydrated powder and favour better consumer acceptance. Chlorophyll a was reported to be thermally less or equally stable than chlorophyll b (King et al 2001), which is largely due to a function of water activity in the material (Schwartz and Lorenzo 1991). Interestingly, higher retention of chlorophyll a than chlorophyll b was observed for all the drying methods and this has not been pointed out previously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Percentage loss of chlorophyll a and b from blanched leaves and un-blanched leaves were 5.55±0.19 and 4.86±0.07 respectively. Furthermore, it was found that the retaining of chlorophyll b content was higher than chlorophyll a because of higher thermal stability of chlorophyll b [29]. However, it was also discovered that percentage loss of chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll in the powder obtaining from blanched sample was significantly lower than those of un-blanched powder.…”
Section: Total Chlorophylls and Carotenoid Contentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both the chlorophyll a and b contents decreased in both the leaves on dehydration indicating that there was loss of green colour. This is due to the liability of chlorophyll to oxidation during processing (Heaton and Marangoni 1996;Schwartz and Lorenzo 1991).…”
Section: Effect Of Dehydration On Bioactive Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%