“…However, only a few analytical techniques have shown some capacity for the determination of chlorine with relative sensitivity and accuracy, mainly for complex matrices, using direct determination. Among these techniques are electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ETV-ICP-MS) (Antes et al, 2013; Gois, Pereira, Welz, & Borges, 2014; Gois, Pereira, Welz, & Borges, 2015), laser induced plasma spectrometry (LIPS)(Kaski, Häkkänen, & Korppi-Tommola, 2004), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF)(Doyle, Saavedra, Tristão, Nele, & Aucélio, 2011), and more recently also highresolution continuum source graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS GF MAS)(Bechlin, Ferreira, & Gomes Neto, 2017;Enders et al, 2016;Guarda et al, 2017;Heitmann, Becker-Ross, Florek, Huang, & Okruss, 2006;Nakadi, da Veiga, Aramendia, Garcia-Ruiz, & Resano, 2015;Ozbek & Akman, 2016;Pereira et al, 2015;Pereira et al, 2014;Welz, Vale, Pereira, Castilho, & Dessuy, 2014). The last technique is a very robust tool with a high tolerance for complex matrices due to the use of a graphite tube furnace, which makes possible the analysis of liquids, slurries and solid samples.…”