2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorination of Phenols Revisited: Unexpected Formation of α,β-Unsaturated C4-Dicarbonyl Ring Cleavage Products

Abstract: Chlorination of phenols revisited: unexpected formation of α,β-unsaturated c4-dicarbonyl ring cleavage products. Environmental Science and Technology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Driving this difference was the higher relative abundance of RND efflux pump genes in public water- versus private well water-supplied showerheads (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 6.85 × 10 –14 ) (Figure b). RND efflux pump genes have been shown to be enriched by the presence of disinfectants in other studies. , A possible explanation for this difference is that the treatment process for municipal water generates toxic compounds during the disinfection process, such as chlorinated phenols, that favor survival of bacteria with inherently robust efflux systems to prevent intracellular damage. Disinfectants have also been shown to impact biofilm detachment, a process that could impact the transmission of ARGs . This difference between public water- and private well water-supplied showerheads could also be related to the higher relative abundances of mycobacteria in the public water-supplied communities, given prevalence of ARGs in the Mycobacterium genus and the significant association of ARGs with mycobacterial relative abundances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Driving this difference was the higher relative abundance of RND efflux pump genes in public water- versus private well water-supplied showerheads (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 6.85 × 10 –14 ) (Figure b). RND efflux pump genes have been shown to be enriched by the presence of disinfectants in other studies. , A possible explanation for this difference is that the treatment process for municipal water generates toxic compounds during the disinfection process, such as chlorinated phenols, that favor survival of bacteria with inherently robust efflux systems to prevent intracellular damage. Disinfectants have also been shown to impact biofilm detachment, a process that could impact the transmission of ARGs . This difference between public water- and private well water-supplied showerheads could also be related to the higher relative abundances of mycobacteria in the public water-supplied communities, given prevalence of ARGs in the Mycobacterium genus and the significant association of ARGs with mycobacterial relative abundances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ubiquitous water disinfectants free chlorine (i.e., HOCl + OCl – ) and monochloramine (NH 2 Cl) induce oxidation reactions that can transform contaminants and produce disinfection byproducts (DBPs) . HOCl and NH 2 Cl quickly oxidize Br – and I – to produce other electrophilic halogen species (e.g., HOBr and HOI). , Researchers examining electrophilic substitution often focus on reactions directly involving the most abundant halogen species [e.g., hypohalous acids (HOX), where X = Cl, Br, or I]. , However, reaction models that include only the electrophiles that are prevalent in chlor­(am)­inated water sometimes fail to accurately predict product distributions and the effects of halide ion concentration, disinfectant concentration, and pH on reaction rates (see examples in Figures S1–S3). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggested a direct interaction of avonoids with hypochlorous acidavonoid chlorinations and a decrease of effective HOCl concentration in erythrocyte suspensions. It is known that the reaction of HOCl with phenolic compounds occurs through an electrophilic attack on an aromatic carbon at the ortho-and para-positions to yield chlorine-substituted products [35,36]. Our theoretical calculation demonstrates possible sites for electrophilic attack in the avonoid molecules (negatively charged C atoms, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%