1965
DOI: 10.2307/4592456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides in Major U.S. River Basins. A Synoptic View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite measures taken to reduce the input of these contaminants into the environment, these compounds and their metabolites persist in the Great Lakes' ecosystem (Tanabe 1988). Significant amounts are still present in the air, water and soil, allowing the contaminants to traverse through the food chain to upper trophic‐level organisms (Weaver et al . 1965; Tanabe et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite measures taken to reduce the input of these contaminants into the environment, these compounds and their metabolites persist in the Great Lakes' ecosystem (Tanabe 1988). Significant amounts are still present in the air, water and soil, allowing the contaminants to traverse through the food chain to upper trophic‐level organisms (Weaver et al . 1965; Tanabe et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrangement of the samples in sequence according to increasing concentration of DDT residues (Table 2) shows a progression according to both size and trophic level, larger organisms and higher carnivores having greater concentrations than smaller organisms In general, the concentrations of DDT residues in carnivorous birds were 10 to 100 times those in the fish on which they feed. Concentrations of DDT in the waters of Great South Bay must be assumed to be less than the 0.0012-ppm saturation limit, a reasonable estimate probably being closer to 0.00005 ppm (4,12). Based on this estimate, birds near the top of these food chains have concentrations of DDT residues about a million times greater than the concentration in the water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DDT[1 , 1, 1-trichloro-2 ,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane] was introduced into the aquatic environment indirectly (26,41) and directly, with the object of controlling the insect vectors of animal diseases (32). The insecticide can be detected in the surface waters or bottom sediments of springs (37), wells (17), sewage effluents (20), irrigation canals (17, 18), ponds (2), lakes (17,25,28), streams (6,8,15,20,40), rivers (1,4,13,17,28,35), river estuaries (3,39), and tidal marshes (11). It was reported that DDT and its analogues are accumulated by freshwater and marine plants (2,8,9,11,19,25,27) and animals (2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14-16, 19, 21,22,25,31,33,36,40,43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%