2001
DOI: 10.5006/1.3290325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloride Corrosion Threshold of Reinforcing Steel in Alkaline Solutions—Open-Circuit Immersion Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
106
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
10
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mendoza et al (1994) also found a very high corrosion rate for the rusted steel bars. On the other hand, AlTayyib et al (1990) reported that the initial rusting does not have an adverse effect on the corrosion resistance of rebar embedded in concrete, which contradicts with the results obtained by Mendoza et al (1994) Novak et al (2001) and Li and Sagues (2001). Also, based on the accelerated laboratory investigations and long-term exposure tests in the marine environment, it was found that micro-structure of steel-concrete interface (physical adhesion, voids, etc.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mendoza et al (1994) also found a very high corrosion rate for the rusted steel bars. On the other hand, AlTayyib et al (1990) reported that the initial rusting does not have an adverse effect on the corrosion resistance of rebar embedded in concrete, which contradicts with the results obtained by Mendoza et al (1994) Novak et al (2001) and Li and Sagues (2001). Also, based on the accelerated laboratory investigations and long-term exposure tests in the marine environment, it was found that micro-structure of steel-concrete interface (physical adhesion, voids, etc.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…For laboratory tests, polished bars (cleaned by sand blasting or chemical method) are commonly used. Based on a study on different surface conditions of steel bars by Li and Sagues (2001), it was concluded that removal of mill scale or rust from the steel surface by sandblasting is beneficial in elevating the chloride corrosion threshold in alkaline solution, although the corrosion rate of sandblasted steel after pitting initiation is higher than those of the mill-scaled and pre-rusted steel bars. Novak et al (2001) reported that pre-rusted steel bars in concrete, even without any chloride content, shows technically unacceptable average corrosion rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steel surface was machined [30], ground [31], sandblasted [26,32] or in most cases mechanically polished [33][34][35][36][37]. Upon exposure to alkaline solutions, literature work agrees on an asymptotical increase of the open circuit potential (OCP) [26,[30][31][32][33][34][36][37][38][39][40] and of the polarization resistance [32,37,38,40] with time of exposure, indicating the formation of a protective iron oxide film. Although a protective passive film starts to form soon after exposure of steel to passivating solutions, the quality and stability of the film depends on the exposure duration and the chemical composition of the passivating solution.…”
Section: Passive Filmmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Protective properties Formation of the passive film leads to a decrease in corrosion rate with time reaching values of \0.1 lA/cm 2 (1 mA/m 2 ) corresponding to mass loss \1 lm/year, i.e. an insignificant rate [32,37,38,40]. This protective nature of the passive state is associated to a marked decrease in the ionic conduction in the film (ion barrier); a lower electronic conduction was also reported [39].…”
Section: Passive Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation