2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorhexidine Impregnated Central Venous Catheter Inducing an Anaphylatic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread and often undocumented use of this agent means that it is frequently unrecognised as a possible cause of allergic reactions 58,59 . If the patient is exposed to chlorhexidine intravenously, such as with chlorhexidine impregnated central venous access devices, anaphylaxis is likely to develop rapidly 60 . If chlorhexidine is absorbed across mucous membranes anaphylaxis is often delayed, as may occur with chlorhexidine containing urethral gels.…”
Section: Chlorhexidinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread and often undocumented use of this agent means that it is frequently unrecognised as a possible cause of allergic reactions 58,59 . If the patient is exposed to chlorhexidine intravenously, such as with chlorhexidine impregnated central venous access devices, anaphylaxis is likely to develop rapidly 60 . If chlorhexidine is absorbed across mucous membranes anaphylaxis is often delayed, as may occur with chlorhexidine containing urethral gels.…”
Section: Chlorhexidinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first CHL‐containing gel anaphylaxis was described in 1992 and the first CHL‐impregnated CVC anaphylaxis was reported in 1997 . The true incidence is unknown but likely under‐reported . Several authors suggest it is ‘rare’ but numerous studies indicate otherwise with incidence ranging from 5.5% to 8.8% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanations include being unaware of the product containing CHL and not testing patients for CHL allergy after their initial anaphylaxis . Many clinicians wrongly attributed their patient's anaphylaxis to another agent such as latex, anaesthetic drugs, penicillin and cefazolin . However, in all the aforementioned, a second anaphylactic reaction occurred prompting appropriate investigation where CHL‐induced anaphylaxis was diagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83,[100][101][102][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][112][113][114][115][116][117]119,120 Cases of anaphylactic shock are reported after placement of a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (Category B4-H evidence). [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129] Survey Findings. The consultants and ASA members agree with the recommendation to use catheters coated with antibiotics or a combination of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine based on infectious risk and anticipated duration of catheter use for selected patients.…”
Section: Practice Guidelines For Central Venous Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%