1985
DOI: 10.1128/jb.164.2.696-703.1985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloramphenicol-induced translation of cat-86 mRNA requires two cis-acting regulatory regions

Abstract: Sequences essential to the chloramphenicol-inducible expression of cat-86, a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, reside in a 144-base pair (bp) regulatory region that intervenes between the cat-86 coding sequence and its promoter. A key regulatory element within the 144-bp segment consists of a pair of inverted-repeat sequences that immediately precede the cat-86 coding region and span the ribosome-binding site for the gene. Because of the location of the inverted repeats, cat-86 transcripts are predicted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was suggested that chloramphenicol modifies ribosomal function, permitting ribosomes to destabilize a stem-loop structure in cat mRNA which sequesters the cat ribosome-binding site (RBS) (13,19). Evidence that is consistent with this posttranscriptional regulatory model has been provided for the cat-86 gene, as well as for inducible cat genes resident on the Staphylococcus plasmids pC194 and pUB112 (1,2,4,7,8,11,12,19,22,27). However, despite efforts in several laboratories, there is no experimental evidence to support models proposed to explain how a ribosome might disrupt a cat RNA stem-loop structure (7,8,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It was suggested that chloramphenicol modifies ribosomal function, permitting ribosomes to destabilize a stem-loop structure in cat mRNA which sequesters the cat ribosome-binding site (RBS) (13,19). Evidence that is consistent with this posttranscriptional regulatory model has been provided for the cat-86 gene, as well as for inducible cat genes resident on the Staphylococcus plasmids pC194 and pUB112 (1,2,4,7,8,11,12,19,22,27). However, despite efforts in several laboratories, there is no experimental evidence to support models proposed to explain how a ribosome might disrupt a cat RNA stem-loop structure (7,8,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…(B) Determination of promoter strength by RNA dot blot analysis. Different concentrations of RNA (10 or 5 p.g) from S. thermophilus A054 containing either pTG244 or recombinant plasmid pTG244-3, pTG244-8, pTG244-14, pTG244-15, pTG244-20, or pTG244-25 were hybridized with the oligonucleotide probe TG1769 (5'-GTGAAAGT GCTCTTTTCGCAG-3') specific for the cat-86 transcript (positions +48 to +28 of the cat-86 sequence [1]). the nucleotide sequence of the putative promoter P25 revealed the presence of consensus sequences at the 3' end of the fragment but no flanking ORF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasmid pPL703 AAC1 (4,967 bp) was the source of the constitutively expressible cat-86 gene. This plasmid carris a deletion and duplication within the region involved in the control of cat-86 gene inducibility, making it constitutively expressible (2). Plasmids pBV502 and pPL703AAC1 were digested with restriction enzymes PstI and HindIII.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of cat-86 gene expression in B. subtilis have shown that inducibility results from the activation of the translation of cat-86 mRNA by drug-modified ribosomes in a process that has been termed translational attenuation (1). The constitutively expression version of the cat-86 gene in B. subtilis plasmid pPL708AAC1 specifies chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity that is four times higher than the activity specified by the inducible version of the gene behind the same promoter (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%