1970
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-60-1175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydospores of Fusarium roseum 'Graminearum' as Survival Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conidia are produced from the sporodochia on infected crops and are responsible for secondary infection [6]. Moreover, modified conidia (chlamydospores or chlamydospore-like structures) are proposed to be other survival structures [1], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conidia are produced from the sporodochia on infected crops and are responsible for secondary infection [6]. Moreover, modified conidia (chlamydospores or chlamydospore-like structures) are proposed to be other survival structures [1], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many abiotic factors have been considered very important in controlling chlamydospore formation in Fusaria (Snyder & Hansen, 1941;Leach, 1962;Nyvall, 1970;Schippers & Old, 1974;Oritsejafor, 1986;Hebbar et al ., 1997;Ciotola et al ., 2000). A factor of high importance appears to be the nutritional status of the medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogen in most instances survived in residues longer than it was able to sporulate on them. Gibberella zeae is known to survive in residues as mycelium or chlamydospores (Nyvall 1970). The inability of surviving mycelium to produce perithecia or macroconidia may arise from depletion of available nutrients in the substrate, a decline in biomass of the pathogen, or from the effects of other organisms in the substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%