2012
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-012-0301-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence, genotype distribution and identification of the new Swedish variant in Southern Germany

Abstract: The overall prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 4.2 % in women and 4.6 % in men. A relatively high prevalence of 8.3 % was found in men older than 25 years. Never using condoms was an independent risk factor for infection. The most common symptom was discharge; however, 64.5 % of infected females and all of the infected men were asymptomatic, supporting the need for screening programmes. The most frequently encountered genotypes were E (46.5 %), F (20.9 %) and K (14.0 %). Since the nvCT was detected in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an observational study performed in 2004 among sexually experienced females aged 14-20 years in Berlin, Germany, CT-positivity of 6.5% (95% CI: 4.7-9.0) was found [24]. In a study performed in 2008-09 in a mid-sized town in Germany, a prevalence of 4.2% was found in 14-19 year-old females and was associated with an early age of first sexual contact and increasing number of lifetime sexual partners [25]. The prevalence in our study might have been underestimated due to the long storage time between taking of specimens being taken and testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an observational study performed in 2004 among sexually experienced females aged 14-20 years in Berlin, Germany, CT-positivity of 6.5% (95% CI: 4.7-9.0) was found [24]. In a study performed in 2008-09 in a mid-sized town in Germany, a prevalence of 4.2% was found in 14-19 year-old females and was associated with an early age of first sexual contact and increasing number of lifetime sexual partners [25]. The prevalence in our study might have been underestimated due to the long storage time between taking of specimens being taken and testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, 'age-bridgers' engaged in more risky sexual behaviour in a cohort of CT-positive heterosexual young men aged 14-24 years [33]. Other reasons for higher prevalence in young girls could be cervical ectopy [34], earlier sexual debut or more partners during this earlier period of sexual experience [23,25]. Poor healthcare-seeking behaviour associated with higher infection rates, lower partner referral or inadequate care have been reported for people with lower socio-economic status in many countries [35][36][37]: our findings of a higher prevalence in girls with low or medium social status are therefore not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41] However, it was subsequently shown that sequence variation of cryptic plasmids has been detected in several countries. [42][43][44] This demonstrates that false-negative results may occur when a cryptic plasmid is used alone as the target for detection of C. trachomatis particularly when screening clinical samples from this region. Previously, several commercial NAATs used a single target on the pathogens associated with sexually transmitted infections, which led to the emergence of a false-negative diagnostic result, and the infection went untreated and was transmitted between individuals without knowledge before being recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Human (n = 172) and murine (n = 4) serum samples were obtained from serum collections of previous studies (Essig et al, 1999;Fieser et al, 2013;Forsbach-Birk et al, 2013;Forsbach-Birk et al, 2010;Wellinghausen et al, 2006) and from patients with respiratory tract infections (bronchitis, pneumonia) submitted for diagnostic work-up to the MVZ Labor Ravensburg. All samples were anonymized and their use was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm (96/09).…”
Section: Serum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%